Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@JasonKleban
Last active November 5, 2024 18:59
Show Gist options
  • Save JasonKleban/50cee44960c225ac1993c922563aa540 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save JasonKleban/50cee44960c225ac1993c922563aa540 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
TypeScript LiteEvent Events implementation
interface ILiteEvent<T> {
on(handler: { (data?: T): void }) : void;
off(handler: { (data?: T): void }) : void;
}
class LiteEvent<T> implements ILiteEvent<T> {
private handlers: { (data?: T): void; }[] = [];
public on(handler: { (data?: T): void }) : void {
this.handlers.push(handler);
}
public off(handler: { (data?: T): void }) : void {
this.handlers = this.handlers.filter(h => h !== handler);
}
public trigger(data?: T) {
this.handlers.slice(0).forEach(h => h(data));
}
public expose() : ILiteEvent<T> {
return this;
}
}
class Security{
private readonly onLogin = new LiteEvent<string>();
private readonly onLogout = new LiteEvent<void>();
public get LoggedIn() { return this.onLogin.expose(); }
public get LoggedOut() { return this.onLogout.expose(); }
// ... onLogin.trigger('bob');
}
function Init() {
var security = new Security();
var loggedOut = () => { /* ... */ }
security.LoggedIn.on((username?) => { /* ... */ });
security.LoggedOut.on(loggedOut);
// ...
security.LoggedOut.off(loggedOut);
}
@maucaro
Copy link

maucaro commented Feb 14, 2021

This was super helpful Jason, thank you! I do have one question: why do you use this.handlers.slice(0).forEach instead of just this.handlers.forEach?

@JasonKleban
Copy link
Author

@maucaro in case one of the earlier handlers modifies the handlers array in the handling of a particular event. It's just the saner general approach, but I guess you can adjust this for your situation.

@itsramiel
Copy link

What is the point of having it private, then having an expose method which returns the instance? Why not make it public from the beginning?

@itsramiel
Copy link

Thank you for this!

The way functions are typed are confusing to me, plus the repeated type definitions:

Here is my take on it, dropping expose(can be added back in for those who need it):

type THandler<T> = (data: T) => void;

interface ILiteEvent<T> {
  on(handler: THandler<T>): void;
  off(handler: THandler<T>): void;
}

export class LiteEvent<T> implements ILiteEvent<T> {
  private handlers = Array<THandler<T>>();

  public on(handler: THandler<T>): void {
    this.handlers.push(handler);
  }

  public off(handler: THandler<T>): void {
    this.handlers = this.handlers.filter((h) => h !== handler);
  }

  public trigger(data: T) {
    this.handlers.slice(0).forEach((h) => h(data));
  }
}

@JasonKleban
Copy link
Author

JasonKleban commented Nov 5, 2024

What is the point of having it private, then having an expose method which returns the instance? Why not make it public from the beginning?

It was an effort to discourage it from being written to. There are probably better ways these days if such control is needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment