| Implementation | Primary Use Case | Key Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| MLton | Production Applications | • Best runtime performance • Efficient native binaries • Good standards compliance |
• Slow compilation speed • No REPL environment • Complex multi-file builds |
| Poly/ML | Development & Learning | • Fast compilation speed • Interactive REPL environment • Simple build process |
• Slower runtime performance (2-3x slower than MLton) • Larger binary sizes |
| SML/NJ | Research & Academia | • Mature ecosystem • Good documentation • Strong academic support |
• Complex compilation manager • Larger binary sizes |
| Moscow ML | Lightweight Projects | • Simple setup • Small footprint • Easy to use |
• Limited module system support • Slower performance |
Created
February 13, 2025 16:45
-
-
Save JeremyOttley/a759fa208e0cf5590a599fee5c3b1667 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
SML compiler differences
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment