Created
January 29, 2010 20:01
-
-
Save PhilGeek/290057 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Dear Professor Palmowski, | |
We the undersigned are writing to you to express our shock at recent events at | |
King’s College. We are concerned with the drastic plans for the reorganization | |
of Humanities with a large number of redundancies. And in particular, we are | |
concerned at the news relating to our own disciplines: that Prof Shalom Lappin | |
and Dr Wilfried Meyer-Viol are to face compulsory redundancy as of autumn | |
2010, and that Prof Charles Travis is to be forced into retirement contrary to | |
the contract on which he was hired in 2005. | |
As we understand the situation, Professor Lappin was informed earlier this | |
week of compulsory redundancy on the basis of KCL ‘divesting itself of | |
computational linguistics’. This is despite the fact that as recently as July | |
2009 you yourself assured him that neither he nor the Department at large was | |
being targeted for redundancies. We understand that there is no department of | |
computational linguistics to be shut down, and that Prof Lappin and Dr | |
Meyer-Viol are full and integral members of the Philosophy Department. We also | |
understand that contrary to contractual agreements about post-retirement age | |
employment, you have sought to force Prof Travis into retirement without | |
conducting the performance review contractually specified, or giving any | |
grounds for forcing the retirement. We understand that these specific cases | |
are part of a larger pattern of reorganization of Humanities at King’s, where | |
you seek to make 22 academics redundant, and have put all academic staff on | |
notice of potential redundancy. | |
The King’s Philosophy Department is internationally recognized as excellent, | |
both in research and teaching undergraduate and graduate students. The RAE | |
2008 confirmed the excellence of this Department. The three members of the | |
Department that you have sought summarily to dismiss are all key elements of | |
the persisting success and excellence of the Department, and the recognition | |
of the excellence of King’s as a whole. | |
We find it amazing that King’s should seek to risk its research excellence by | |
summarily dismissing senior staff in this way. We are concerned not only with | |
the scant regard of academic norms in maintaining a university with any | |
international standing, but also with the reckless manner in which you have | |
sought to deal with individuals and their careers, seemingly without regard | |
for proper procedure; or due concern for individual welfare. | |
The reorganization of the Humanities School, developed without consultation of | |
the academics affected, seems wilfully to ignore the intellectual strengths | |
and organization of the disciplines within the school. Such a savage reduction | |
of staff numbers through compulsory redundancy removes any appearance of job | |
security for academics at King’s. The best candidates in the humanities will | |
shun the institution; and those of strong standing now in post will all seek | |
to leave. The reorganization will succeed in the aim of making a once great | |
institution manifestly mediocre. | |
Universities may act on occasion in ways contrary to the general good, or | |
against the core academic purposes of such institutions. They do so only | |
through the decisions and acts of particular individuals. We are in no doubt | |
that in so callously treating Prof Lappin, Dr Meyer-Viol, and Prof Travis you | |
have shown yourself individually responsible for this dreadful state of | |
affairs. | |
We protest strongly at KCL’s action, and at your part in it. We reiterate our | |
admiration for the King’s Humanities School in general, for the Philosophy | |
Department in particular, and for the three individuals that you have treated | |
so shabbily. We urge you to reconsider your actions and to reinstate all three | |
in the Philosophy Department and we urge you to reconsider your plans for the | |
reorganization of the Humanities School. | |
UCL Dept of Philosophy Dr Nadine Elzein, Prof Sebastian Gardner, Prof Marcus | |
Giaquinto, Prof Mark Eli Kalderon, Dr Fiona Leigh, Dr Rory Madden, Prof | |
Michael Martin, Prof Véronique Munoz-Dardé, Dr Lucy O’Brien, Prof Michael | |
Otsuka, Prof Christopher Peacocke, FBA, Dr Sarah Richmond, Prof Paul Snowdon, | |
Dr Tom Stern, Prof Jonathan Wolff, Dr José Zalabardo, Dr Arnold Zuboff | |
UCL Division of Psychology & Language Sciences Dr Klaus Abels, Dr Richard | |
Breheny, Prof Robyn Carston, Prof Nick Chater, Dr Nathan Klinedinst, Dr Hans | |
van der Koot, Prof Ad Neeleman, Dr Nausicaa Pouscoulous, Prof Deirdre Wilson, | |
FBA | |
SOAS Dept of the Cultures and Languages of Near and Middle East Prof Colin | |
Shindler | |
Institute of Education Dept of Psychology and Human Development Dr Matthew | |
Saxton | |
University of Manchester School of Social Science Eve Garrard |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment