Last active
December 28, 2015 15:49
-
-
Save SupernaviX/7524127 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
SAS 1-4 and 6, now with unfucked spacing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1. Introduction | |
The purpose of this document is to describe and clearly define the creation process of Project BOLO. It will give a clear timeline for the development and release of each deliverable, and inform the client about the requirements of the project. | |
2. Scope | |
2.1 Identification | |
System Analysis Specification | |
SAS-001 | |
Revision 1 | |
November 18, 2013 | |
2.2. Bounds | |
The product being described in this SRS is BOLO, short for “Bugs Only Live Once”. This software will continuously run on an integration server, and will allow developers to define a set of actions to perform against an external test server and describe the expected results. BOLO will continuously perform these actions and alert the developers if any failed, thus detecting functionality regression before the regression is pushed to a production server. BOLO will not be responsible for updating the external test server. | |
2.3. Objectives | |
This project will be treated as a medium priority project. It will be developed using an incremental life cycle, and using the agile methodology. The initial milestone delivery dates are listed below. | |
//patrick this shit is a table | |
Deliverable Product Estimated Date of Delivery | |
Project Proposal 9/25 | |
Software Requirements Specification (SRS) 10/23 | |
Software Project Management Plan (SPMP) 11/6 | |
Software Analysis Specification (SAS) 11/18 | |
Software Design Document (SDD) 12/2 | |
2.4. System Overview | |
The system to be produced is a continuously running server that allows developers to define both a set of actions to perform and certain criteria for the expected results of these actions. It them performs these actions constantly against an intermediate deployment environment and compares their results to the expected results. In this way, functionality regression could be detected before code made it to production. | |
2.5. Document Overview | |
//patrick these should be bulleted or a list or something | |
Business Requirements: Which goals the software is being designed to achieve | |
Logical Architectural Specification: The workings of the software | |
Non-Functional/Operational Specifications: Requirements for the project that don't directly relate to its structure | |
System Test Plan Requirements: The test plans, with scenario testing and required simulators | |
Qualification Provisions: How quality assurance will be performed on the project | |
Requirements Traceability: This section describes how requirements will be met throughout the construction of the product. | |
Rationale | |
Notes | |
Appendices | |
3. Reference Documents | |
//patrick these look just like in the SPMP | |
Project Proposal | |
Version 2 | |
Date 25 September, 2013 | |
Software Requirements Specification (SRS) | |
Version 2 | |
Date 25 October, 2013 | |
Software Project Management Plan (SPMP) | |
Version 1 | |
Date 9 November, 2013 | |
4. Business Requirements | |
4.1. Technology | |
The purpose of BOLO is to help streamline the development process of the division’s developers. BOLO will improve the quality of the existing product and reduce development time by detecting regressions in functionality much earlier in the development cycle. | |
4.2. Economics | |
The main product being produced by the division was originally conceived as being contracted to external sources. Upon the realization that it could be produced by a specialized team in-house at a fraction of the cost, the project was handed to the division. Since the goal is to stay far below the original projected cost, BOLO is being developed for the purpose of reducing the billable man-hours required to test the main product. | |
4.3. Regulatory and Legal | |
This project has no regulatory or legal drivers. | |
4.4. Market Considerations | |
This project is specifically being targeted towards the developers of the Division of Operations, Technical, and Support Services at New York University. | |
4.5. Risks and Alternatives | |
One risk is that BOLO reports incorrectly. In such a case instead of saving the developers time, it will instead waste it as now the developers must not only verify the bugs for themselves, but also dig through BOLO to see if the problems are with BOLO itself or with the scenario descriptions given to it for testing purposes. | |
Another risk is that one of the developers of BOLO may leave the team; this is, however, not a major problem as the division has other skilled developers that can be moved to work on BOLO. Since we are using an incremental update process, this will not have significant impact on the update cycle. | |
4.6. Human Resources and Training | |
All members of the team are already trained and adept in the various technological requirements required. The team will continue to be paid by the division by which they are employed, and will have access to division resources including servers and workstations. | |
6. Non-Functional/Operational Specifications | |
6.1. System External Interface Requirements | |
The system must be accessible, user-friendly, and allow users to fully specify tests. | |
6.2. Safety Requirements | |
N/A | |
6.3. Security and Privacy Requirements | |
N/A | |
6.4. System Environment Requirements | |
M/A | |
6.5. Computer Resource Requirements | |
6.5.1. Computer Hardware Requirements | |
N/A | |
6.5.2. Computer Hardware Resource Requirements | |
N/A | |
6.5.3. Computer Software Requirements | |
The software must be written in C++. | |
The software must run on a Linux-based operating system. | |
6.5.4. Computer Communications Requirements | |
The system must have constant access to whichever external product is being tested. | |
6.6. System Quality Factors | |
The product must be easily usable by software developers. | |
6.7. Design and Construction Constraints | |
The software's development team will use an iterative life cycle model. | |
The development team must follow C++ coding standards and best programming practices. | |
6.8. Personnel-Related Requirements | |
N/A | |
6.9. Training-Related Requirements | |
N/A | |
6.10. Logistics-Related Requirements | |
N/A | |
6.11. Packaging Requirements | |
N/A | |
6.12. Precedence and Criticality Requirements | |
N/A | |
6.13. Other Requirements | |
N/A |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment