In this paper, the authors explore ████ ███████ ██ ███ ██████████ ██ ███████ ███ █████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██████ ███████████ ███ █████ ██ ██████████ ████ ██ ███████████ ████ ███ ██████ ██ ██████ █████████ █████████ █████ ███ ███ █████ ██ ███ ████ █████████ ███ ████████ █████ ████ ███ ███████████ █████████ █████ ██████████████ ███████ ██ ███ ████ ██████. This is important work!
The theory is strong and the qualitative work is well done and complements the experiment. I have some reservations and questions about the methods and analysis, but these issues are all fixable. I list my observations and comments below.
praise: This is an excellent and tightly written experiment that tests a specific, narrow, important hypothesis in a rigorous way. This is all incredibly fascinating and well done!