Created
February 23, 2025 14:18
-
-
Save arraytools/4948ad7b8a007dad1f93595bff3ed463 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
ai prompts for research https://medium.com/@Vugar_Ibrahimov/10-chatgpt-and-claude-ai-prompts-for-faster-academic-reading-ece583dd132c
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1. The Elevator Pitch Summary | |
Prompt: "Summarise this paper in 3–5 sentences, as if you're explaining it to a colleague in an elevator ride." | |
2. Key Findings Extraction | |
Prompt: "List the top 5 key findings or conclusions from this paper, along with a brief explanation of each." | |
3. Methodology Breakdown | |
Prompt: "Explain the methodology used in this study in simple terms. What are its strengths and potential limitations?" | |
4. Literature Review Assistant | |
Prompt: "Identify the key papers cited in the literature review section. For each, provide a one-sentence summary of how it relates to the current study." | |
5. Jargon Buster | |
Prompt: "List any specialized terms or acronyms used in this paper, along with their definitions in layman's terms." | |
6. Visual Aid Interpreter | |
Prompt: "Explain the key takeaways from Figure X (or Table Y) in the paper. What is its significance to the overall study?" | |
7. Implications Explorer | |
Prompt: "What are the potential real-world implications or applications of this research? Suggest 3–5 possible impacts." | |
8. Cross-Disciplinary Connections | |
Prompt: "How might the findings or methods of this paper be relevant to [insert your field of study]? Suggest potential connections or applications." | |
9. Future Research Generator | |
Prompt: "Based on the limitations and unanswered questions in this paper, suggest 3–5 potential directions for future research." | |
10. The Devil's Advocate | |
Prompt: "Play devil's advocate: What are potential criticisms or counterarguments to the main claims of this paper? How might the authors respond?" | |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment