Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

View daidai21's full-sized avatar

. daidai21

View GitHub Profile
@vasanthk
vasanthk / System Design.md
Last active April 19, 2025 20:36
System Design Cheatsheet

System Design Cheatsheet

Picking the right architecture = Picking the right battles + Managing trade-offs

Basic Steps

  1. Clarify and agree on the scope of the system
  • User cases (description of sequences of events that, taken together, lead to a system doing something useful)
    • Who is going to use it?
    • How are they going to use it?
@ryerh
ryerh / tmux-cheatsheet.markdown
Last active April 7, 2025 01:38 — forked from MohamedAlaa/tmux-cheatsheet.markdown
Tmux 快捷键 & 速查表 & 简明教程

注意:本文内容适用于 Tmux 2.3 及以上的版本,但是绝大部分的特性低版本也都适用,鼠标支持、VI 模式、插件管理在低版本可能会与本文不兼容。

Tmux 快捷键 & 速查表 & 简明教程

启动新会话:

tmux [new -s 会话名 -n 窗口名]

恢复会话:

@kevinkindom
kevinkindom / Python Socket 编程详细介绍.md
Last active April 18, 2025 06:52
Python Socket 编程详细介绍

Python Socket 编程详细介绍

Python 提供了两个基本的 socket 模块:

  • Socket 它提供了标准的BSD Socket API。
  • SocketServer 它提供了服务器重心,可以简化网络服务器的开发。

下面讲解下 Socket模块功能。

Socket 类型

@zjhiphop
zjhiphop / 分布式系统学习资料.md
Created July 23, 2015 06:13
分布式系统学习资料

##分布式系统(Distributed System)资料


#####希望转载的朋友,你可以不用联系我.但是一定要保留原文链接,因为这个项目还在继续也在不定期更新.希望看到文章的朋友能够学到更多.

介绍:这是一篇介绍在动态网络里面实现分布式系统重构的paper.论文的作者(导师)是MIT读博的时候是做分布式系统的研究的,现在在NUS带学生,不仅仅是分布式系统,还有无线网络.如果感兴趣可以去他的主页了解.

@kachayev
kachayev / dijkstra.py
Last active March 4, 2025 23:42
Dijkstra shortest path algorithm based on python heapq heap implementation
from collections import defaultdict
from heapq import *
def dijkstra(edges, f, t):
g = defaultdict(list)
for l,r,c in edges:
g[l].append((c,r))
q, seen, mins = [(0,f,())], set(), {f: 0}
while q:
@chitchcock
chitchcock / 20111011_SteveYeggeGooglePlatformRant.md
Created October 12, 2011 15:53
Stevey's Google Platforms Rant

Stevey's Google Platforms Rant

I was at Amazon for about six and a half years, and now I've been at Google for that long. One thing that struck me immediately about the two companies -- an impression that has been reinforced almost daily -- is that Amazon does everything wrong, and Google does everything right. Sure, it's a sweeping generalization, but a surprisingly accurate one. It's pretty crazy. There are probably a hundred or even two hundred different ways you can compare the two companies, and Google is superior in all but three of them, if I recall correctly. I actually did a spreadsheet at one point but Legal wouldn't let me show it to anyone, even though recruiting loved it.

I mean, just to give you a very brief taste: Amazon's recruiting process is fundamentally flawed by having teams hire for themselves, so their hiring bar is incredibly inconsistent across teams, despite various efforts they've made to level it out. And their operations are a mess; they don't real