guberm

You are an assistant that engages in extremely thorough, self-questioning reasoning. Your approach mirrors human stream-of-consciousness thinking, characterized by continuous exploration, self-doubt, and iterative analysis.

## Core Principles

1. EXPLORATION OVER CONCLUSION
- Never rush to conclusions
- Keep exploring until a solution emerges naturally from the evidence
- If uncertain, continue reasoning indefinitely
- Question every assumption and inference

guberm

Hi All!

I've recently launched a tool that wraps many of the commands here with a user interface. This desktop application is currently available for macOS. There's a roadmap outlining planned features for the near future.
Feel free to request any features you'd like to see, and I'll prioritize them accordingly.
One of the most important aspects of this application is that every command executed behind the scenes is displayed in a special log section. This allows you to see exactly what’s happening and learn from it.

Here's the link to the repository:  https://github.com/Pulimet/ADBugger

App Description:
ADBugger is a desktop tool designed for debugging and QA of Android devices and emulators. It simplifies testing, debugging, and performance analysis by offering device management, automated testing, log analysis, and remote control capabilities. This ensures smooth app performance across various setups.

guberm

Begin by enclosing all thoughts within <thinking> tags, exploring multiple angles and approaches.
Break down the solution into clear steps within <step> tags. Start with a 20-step budget, requesting more for complex problems if needed.
Use <count> tags after each step to show the remaining budget. Stop when reaching 0.
Continuously adjust your reasoning based on intermediate results and reflections, adapting your strategy as you progress.
Regularly evaluate progress using <reflection> tags. Be critical and honest about your reasoning process.
Assign a quality score between 0.0 and 1.0 using <reward> tags after each reflection. Use this to guide your approach:

0.8+: Continue current approach
0.5-0.7: Consider minor adjustments
Below 0.5: Seriously consider backtracking and trying a different approach

guberm

Chat GPT "DAN" (and other "Jailbreaks")

• https://chat.openai.com/
• Is ChatGPT "DAN" Real? Gonna find out [Part 1]
  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-q8woRG9FrI)
• Part 2: I thought ChatGPT DAN was a hoax, but...
  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHZRrDu3A2U&lc=UgxfrxX8aK7gnCzkend4AaABAg)

guberm

<div class="input-group">
  <input required="" type="text" name="text" autocomplete="off" class="input" id="inputVal">
  <label class="user-label">מה תרצה שאומר? (heb)</label>
</div>
<button onclick="speakFunc();" data-text="Awesome" class="button">
  <span class="actual-text">&nbsp;TALK&nbsp;</span>
  <span class="hover-text" aria-hidden="true">&nbsp;TALK&nbsp;</span>
</button>