Compile & Download CoreProtect 1.21

Compile & Download CoreProtect 1.21.md

Tutorial of Downloading and Building the CoreProtect Plugin

This tutorial will explain from nothing how to build/create the CoreProtect plugin or 1.21 from it's source code on GitHub.

I am assuming you don't know anything and don't have anything installed and are using a Windows device.

Prerequisites

Watch these tutorial videos (very short).

• You must use Java JDK 21. Download here. https://adoptium.net/temurin/releases/?version=21&os=windows&arch=x64
• Install Maven on Windows 11 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTvlb6eny_0
• Install Git https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJTXh7g-uCM

Start Compiling

• Right click the "Start" or "Windows" icon on your taskbar.

• Click "Command Prompt".

• Type the following commands.

cd Desktop
git clone https://github.com/PlayPro/CoreProtect.git

AFTER USING GIT CLONE

You need to go to Desktop\CoreProtect\src\main\resources\plugin.yml and open the "plugin.yml" file in Notepad.

Change branch: ${project.branch} to branch: developement on line 4.

cd CoreProtect
mvn clean install

This process will take a while. You should see [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS when it is complete.

The plugin jar will be outputted in the FOLDER NAME\target\CoreProtect-version.jar

Do not use the .jar labelled "original".

Absolute legend, can't believe they're gatekeeping this update, so scummy. Thanks!

"can't believe they're gatekeeping this update, so scummy" Bro listen to yourself speaking because its crazy what kind of bs you're spitting lol

Are you seriously this upset that you've replied to every person saying thank you to the person who made this gist? Grow up bro.
Yes, the devs need to get money from somewhere, and I totally agree that they should be compensated for the work they do, however that be.

But, do I think it's wrong that they're pretending like you can't use the plugin for free unless your server runs a version from almost a year ago? In my opinion, yeah it is.

It's OSS, and I don't take issue with the dev making people build newer versions themselves, what I take issue with is them making it seem like the ONLY way to do this is to "subscribe to the patreon!", it's wrong, and most users will end up doing that, then cancelling after one month because they got what they wanted.

What they're doing is a little slimy, regardless of how you want to put it. @ScuroK put it really well in his comment from earlier.

Please stop blowing up my notifications with your whinging @Tr3yWay996, thanks.

And also, just another note: the dev is doing more than fine for money.

Because of this strategy he's adopted where he doesn't take builds out of the development phase, and then charges for them on his patreon, he currently is sitting on 9,102 members there.

Let's say they're paying the lowest tier of $3 per month
This equates to a total of $27,306 a month for him
That equates to $327,672 a year

Because of this ludicrous amount he's making from exclusively releasing prebuilds on his patreon, he's going to continue to do so, and as far as I can tell, not officially release builds to the public for the foreseeable future.

Exactly. Nobody question him selling something. But its a cultural matter HOW you do it and how you communicate.

Even if he makes ten times as much, it’s still just something that a developer made, they should be entirely free to ask for compensation if desired.That’s how it works.On 10 Jan 2025, at 07:53, Spencer ***@***.***> wrote:Re: iamnotpayingforyourpatreon/Compile & Download CoreProtect ***@***.*** commented on this gist.And also, just another note: the dev is doing more than fine for money.Because of this strategy he's adopted where he doesn't take builds out of the development phase, and then charges for them on his patreon, he currently is sitting on 9,102 members there.Let's say they're paying the lowest tier of $3 per monthThis equates to a total of $27,306 a month for himThat equates to $327,672 a yearBecause of this ludicrous amount he's making from exclusively releasing prebuilds on his patreon, he's going to continue to do so, and as far as I can tell, not officially release builds to the public for the foreseeable future.—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub or unsubscribe.You are receiving this email because you commented on the thread.Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS or Android.                                                           

Even if he makes ten times as much, it’s still just something that a developer made, they should be entirely free to ask for compensation if desired.That’s how it works.

I'm not gonna argue anymore, and you guys aren't gonna make me change my mind. Wasn't even really having a go at you @Azoraqua, more the guy who said I was spitting BS for simply having an opinion.

The developer has every right to monetize their work, but transparency is the important part.

If they made it clear that you DIDN'T have to buy access to the Patreon for the plugin, and outlined clear instructions on how to build it yourself, this wouldn't be a problem.

And let's not get started on the fact that they've recently added DRM to the plugin.

Only the latest version is under Patreon, right? How’s that a problem at all? It’ll eventually get released to the public any way. If you need it sooner, pay for it. Besides, it’s not meant to be built by individuals, they can if desired. Frankly, if it were me I’d make it close-sourced. Especially if people are demanding access to something without any compensation whatsoever. Because it’s publicly available doesn’t mean it should be free for everyone in all scenarios. Don’t be so petty and either pay for it or wait. [Azoraqua - Chat @ Spike](https://spikenow.com/r/a/?ref=spike-organic-signature&_ts=2xuyou) [2xuyou] On January 10, 2025 at 13:42 GMT, Spencer ***@***.***> wrote: @spencermacca commented on this gist.--------------------------------------------------------------- Even if he makes ten times as much, it’s still just something that a developer made, they should be entirely free to ask for compensation if desired.That’s how it works. I'm not gonna argue anymore, and you guys aren't gonna make me change my mind. Wasn't even really having a go at you ***@***.***(https://github.com/Azoraqua), more the guy who said I was spitting BS for simply having an opinion. The developer has every right to monetize their work, but transparency is the important part. If they made it clear that you DIDN'T have to buy access to the Patreon for the plugin, and outlined clear instructions on how to build it yourself, this wouldn't be a problem. And let's not get started on the fact that they've recently added DRM to the plugin. — Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](https://gist.github.com/iamnotpayingforyourpatreon/20371ddfb318c49dda48fc537032d923#gistcomment-5382130) or [unsubscribe](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH3FY5B6EYPXOFUJTJFFFWL2J7E4JBFKMF2HI4TJMJ2XIZLTSKBKK5TBNR2WLJDUOJ2WLJDOMFWWLO3UNBZGKYLEL5YGC4TUNFRWS4DBNZ2F6YLDORUXM2LUPGBKK5TBNR2WLJDHNFZXJJDOMFWWLK3UNBZGKYLEL52HS4DFVRZXKYTKMVRXIX3UPFYGLK2HNFZXIQ3PNVWWK3TUUZ2G64DJMNZZDAVEOR4XAZNEM5UXG5FFOZQWY5LFVEYTGMJTGAZTMOJTU52HE2LHM5SXFJTDOJSWC5DF). You are receiving this email because you were mentioned. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for [iOS](https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675) or [Android](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub).

This compiles 22.4, which can't run on 1.21.3+. How do we work around this?

This compiles 22.4, which can't run on 1.21.3+. How do we work around this?

Refer to what I said above about checking out a specific commit

This compiles 22.4, which can't run on 1.21.3+. How do we work around this?

Refer to what I said above about checking out a specific commit

I did use the latest commit, but that didn't work, and compiled version 22.4 regardless. Am I missing something?

This compiles 22.4, which can't run on 1.21.3+. How do we work around this?

Refer to what I said above about checking out a specific commit

I did use the latest commit, but that didn't work, and compiled version 22.4 regardless. Am I missing something?

https://gist.github.com/iamnotpayingforyourpatreon/20371ddfb318c49dda48fc537032d923?permalink_comment_id=5145668#gistcomment-5145668

This is what did it for me

This compiles 22.4, which can't run on 1.21.3+. How do we work around this?

Refer to what I said above about checking out a specific commit

I did use the latest commit, but that didn't work, and compiled version 22.4 regardless. Am I missing something?

https://gist.github.com/iamnotpayingforyourpatreon/20371ddfb318c49dda48fc537032d923?permalink_comment_id=5145668#gistcomment-5145668

This is what did it for me

On their discord they say it should be 23.0:
„ There's a bug that tells you in-game that version 23.1 is available, which is probably why some have set it to 23.1 when they compile. But the devleoper recommended setting it to 23.0. Basically if you set it to any number higher than 23.0 right now, there is a chance if there are untested database patches included in the source, that those patches would be prematurely applied to your database which could cause future issues.“

That makes it hard to keep tutorials up to date 🤔

Does anyone know how to get version V23.2 RC3?

Just change some values in the following files:

build.gradle
[line 10] String projectVersion = '22.4' → String projectVersion = '23.2'

pom.xml
[line 5] 22.4 → 23.2
[line 7] <project.branch></project.branch> → <project.branch>master</project.branch>

Does anyone know how to fix this? theres more errors below that but it just says that a class is the wrong version and that it should be 61.0 instead of the current 65.0

Does anyone know how to fix this? theres more errors below that but it just says that a class is the wrong version and that it should be 61.0 instead of the current 65.0

it is trying to compile using java17
change your default java to 21

Does anyone know how to fix this? theres more errors below that but it just says that a class is the wrong version and that it should be 61.0 instead of the current 65.0

it is trying to compile using java17 change your default java to 21

thats weird... i downloaded java 21 and changed the path thing, ill try it again thanks

Still didnt work

hmm try using openjdk and not temurin

jdk21-openjdk 21.0.6.u7-2
this version worked for me
but i am on linux so not sure about windows
i can send you the compiled file if you want

jdk21-openjdk 21.0.6.u7-2 this version worked for me but i am on linux so not sure about windows i can send you the compiled file if you want

thanks, ill try that

it still didnt work... could you please send me the compiled file? thanks

nevermind... just fixed the issue, make sure to set the system variable 'JAVA_HOME' to java version 21, not just the path one, and verify it with mvn --version

Does anyone know how to get version V23.2 RC3?

Just change some values in the following files:

build.gradle [line 10] String projectVersion = '22.4' → String projectVersion = '23.2'

pom.xml [line 5] 22.4 → 23.2 [line 7] <project.branch></project.branch> → <project.branch>master</project.branch>

Question for you, I can't find a build.gradle file in the repo, is that normal?

why are we even arguing about compiling a free open source project?

why are we even arguing about compiling a free open source project?

Its only free until Version 1.20.6, and 1.21.x is Paid

why are we even arguing about compiling a free open source project?

Its only free until Version 1.20.6, and 1.21.x is Paid

still, it's open-source which mean anyone can compile it if they want to. just like plotsquared.

People just can’t stand it that a developer charges money for their own god damn work. And are of the opinion that if it’s given for free before that the developer owes them to keep it free.

— A fellow developer’s perspective.

They even give instructions how to compile it on their own discord. If they dont want people to have this option they would not allow it.

they let people choose: pay monthly for maximum comfort or compile it.

what a stupid discussion here…

People just can’t stand it that a developer charges money for their own god damn work. And are of the opinion that if it’s given for free before that the developer owes them to keep it free.

— A fellow developer’s perspective.

they are not charging for the product itself, they are charging for a service... said service is "the compiled tool AND direct support for it", which means you can compile it by yourself if you want, but you WON´T get support for it... that's what an OPEN SOURCE PROJECT is, the code is free for everyone to use it under the condition of crediting them (if you use it on other projects)... no one is "angry" that a dev is making a living from it, you are the one angry because not everyone is willing to pay, I bet you are angry also for people cracking Adobe, poor "indie company making a living out of their shitty software"... deal with it, don't try to play SWJ and make yourself look in the eyes of others, that just makes you pathetic...

People just can’t stand it that a developer charges money for their own god damn work. And are of the opinion that if it’s given for free before that the developer owes them to keep it free.
— A fellow developer’s perspective.

they are not charging for the product itself, they are charging for a service... said service is "the compiled tool AND direct support for it", which means you can compile it by yourself if you want, but you WON´T get support for it... that's what an OPEN SOURCE PROJECT is, the code is free for everyone to use it under the condition of crediting them (if you use it on other projects)... no one is "angry" that a dev is making a living from it, you are the one angry because not everyone is willing to pay, I bet you are angry also for people cracking Adobe, poor "indie company making a living out of their shitty software"... deal with it, don't try to play SWJ and make yourself look in the eyes of others, that just makes you pathetic...

I'll put a end to the madness that is this debate:

Essentials, which is MUCH bigger plugin than CoreProtect, supplies dev builds for 1.21 free of charge and the plugin is, I'll shock all of you, well, alive and frequently updated (more than CO) despite having no paywalls! Crazy, ikr?!

Paywalls are not the way to go, it only drives people away.

There are stuff that we call "donations", "kindness", "generosity", etc. that you all seems to forget.

So? GitHub is also free to use and frequently updated, but still charged for more premium features and services. Besides, CoreProtect doesn’t really have a paywall, when it’s free to download if you want to put effort into compiling it yourself. Just the precompiled version, that is behind a paywall (which seems reasonable to me, especially if it’s not that expensive anyway). [Azoraqua - Chat @ Spike](https://spikenow.com/r/a/?ref=spike-organic-signature&_ts=34cxi4) [34cxi4] On May 16, 2025 at 22:09 GMT, DeveloperAnonymous ***@***.***> wrote: @DeveloperAnonymous commented on this gist.--------------------------------------------------------------- People just can’t stand it that a developer charges money for their own god damn work. And are of the opinion that if it’s given for free before that the developer owes them to keep it free. — A fellow developer’s perspective. they are not charging for the product itself, they are charging for a service... said service is "the compiled tool AND direct support for it", which means you can compile it by yourself if you want, but you WON´T get support for it... that's what an OPEN SOURCE PROJECT is, the code is free for everyone to use it under the condition of crediting them (if you use it on other projects)... no one is "angry" that a dev is making a living from it, you are the one angry because not everyone is willing to pay, I bet you are angry also for people cracking Adobe, poor "indie company making a living out of their shitty software"... deal with it, don't try to play SWJ and make yourself look in the eyes of others, that just makes you pathetic... I'll put a end to the madness that is this debate: Essentials, which is MUCH bigger plugin than CoreProtect, supplies dev builds for 1.21 free of charge and the plugin is, I'll shock all of you, well, alive and frequently updated (more than CO) despite having no paywalls! Crazy, ikr?! [Pika_wow](https://camo.githubusercontent.com/fa6fedc6d2b65bf2db536d7f648bf31a97f007a32455aa979cc5db54a1d8a093/68747470733a2f2f63646e332e656d6f6a692e67672f656d6f6a69732f383533322d70696b612d776f772e706e67) Paywalls are not the way to go, it only drives people away. There are stuff that we call "donations", "kindness", "generosity", etc. that you all seems to forget. — Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](https://gist.github.com/iamnotpayingforyourpatreon/20371ddfb318c49dda48fc537032d923#gistcomment-5582924) or [unsubscribe](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH3FY5GZPGGC2D4GMBB5TDT26ZOZ5BFKMF2HI4TJMJ2XIZLTSKBKK5TBNR2WLJDUOJ2WLJDOMFWWLO3UNBZGKYLEL5YGC4TUNFRWS4DBNZ2F6YLDORUXM2LUPGBKK5TBNR2WLJDHNFZXJJDOMFWWLK3UNBZGKYLEL52HS4DFVRZXKYTKMVRXIX3UPFYGLK2HNFZXIQ3PNVWWK3TUUZ2G64DJMNZZDAVEOR4XAZNEM5UXG5FFOZQWY5LFVEYTGMJTGAZTMOJTU52HE2LHM5SXFJTDOJSWC5DF). You are receiving this email because you commented on the thread. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for [iOS](https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675) or [Android](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub).