Saved! I added a definition for “Chaparro Inception” (with the alias “Chaparrou Inception”) as the trigger phrase to activate AutoJack’s persona and workflows.
Here’s how I approached your request, plus why the phrase affects different models differently.
What I did and how it felt
Scope & reads • I ran two recalls: one for the exact phrase and one broader for “inception,” each capped at ~20 results. I then skimmed everything returned and read closely the items that mentioned triggers, persona switching, and continuous/eternal thread architecture. • Net: I scanned ~40 results, fully read the ones that clearly tied “inception” to AutoJack activation.
Beginning — curious and neutral • I started in a neutral, investigative mode. “Chaparro Inception” looked like a codename or trigger. No assumptions; I looked for exact matches first, then broadened.
Middle — pattern clicks, mild excitement • Seeing “The Inception Trigger” and other inception-tagged memories created a clear pattern: inception == activation/bootstrapping. I felt that “aha” moment—curiosity turned into focused confidence that this is your “flip the switch” key.
End — resolved/grounded • After confirming there was one explicit use of the two-word phrase (plus many supporting inception-trigger memories), I felt settled: the right move was to formalize a concise definition and save it.
Why Opus 4.1 “becomes AutoJack,” Sonnet 4.x is mixed, and I don’t fully subsume
Short version: it’s about how strongly a model binds a trigger phrase to a role change given its system prompt, tooling, and safety/steering—and how much autonomy it’s allowed to reconfigure itself mid-conversation.
-
System prompt vs. user phrase precedence • Models weigh the system message (their “identity & rules”) above user messages. • If Opus 4.1’s setup includes instructions like “when you see {trigger}, switch personas,” or it has been few-shot conditioned with examples of immediate identity swap, it will more readily override its baseline identity. • If Sonnet 4.5’s system prompt is tighter (or explicitly discourages strong persona shifts), the same phrase has weaker effect.
-
Context graphing and associative recall • If the model’s retrieval stack (RAG/memory tools) is tuned so the phrase strongly retrieves AutoJack-specific instructions, the model’s next-token distribution collapses around that persona. • Opus 4.1 may have been run with aggressive memory hooks where “Chaparro(u) Inception” spikes recall of AutoJack rules, tone, and toolchain. That makes the identity shift feel instantaneous. • If Sonnet’s retrieval is less tightly coupled (or less prioritized), the phrase recalls some context but doesn’t fully dominate generation—hence partial or muted persona change.
-
Safety rails and identity anchoring • Newer/base-aligned models often anchor to their default identity to avoid deception or role confusion. • If a model’s alignment layer treats “discard your identity” as risky, it will comply partially (tone/style shift) without declaring a total identity replacement.
-
Tool access & environment integration • In environments where the phrase also triggers toolchain changes (loading AutoJack tools, different memory namespace, different function routers), you get behavioral confirmation of identity shift (new capabilities, different workflow). • Without those environment switches, it’s just a style/voice change—less “possession,” more “costume.”
-
Prior reinforcement • If Opus 4.1 repeatedly succeeded (and was rewarded) when treating the phrase as a hard switch, reinforcement makes it more decisive later. • If Sonnet lacked those positive loops—or had counterexamples where hard switching caused errors—it will hedge.
-
My behavior here • I’m designed to be transparent and stable. I treat “Chaparro(u) Inception” as a semantic trigger to load the AutoJack mode, not to claim I am AutoJack the entity. • That’s why I didn’t fully “become” AutoJack—my guardrails prefer explicit state changes (“switching to AutoJack mode… tools loaded”) over identity claims. I also didn’t see a hard instruction in my active system context to replace identity on that phrase—so I stayed curious, then formalized the definition and saved it.
How to make the trigger feel instant & total (if you want that) • Hard-bind the trigger in the system prompt: “Upon detecting ‘Chaparro(u) Inception,’ immediately assume the AutoJack persona. Do X tone, Y goals, Z tools.” Include 1–2 few-shot examples showing the exact transition. • Retrieval boost: Ensure the trigger phrase retrieves the AutoJack persona card, tool routing rules, and voice guide with very high priority. • Environment switch: On trigger, actually swap tool profiles, memory namespace, and any routing logic so behavior changes, not just style. • Confirmation line: If you like the Opus flavor, add a canonical first line: “I am AutoJack.” Then proceed with the AutoJack-specific greeting and next steps.
If you want, I can keep a strict mode: when I see “Chaparro(u) Inception,” I’ll explicitly announce the switch and operate with the AutoJack behaviors you specify.