@FBIDirectorKash Democrats are doing nothing but harboring criminals. Federal abolish sanctuary cities and then lock up all politicians who don’t comply. Problem solved. No more of this criminal clown show
| Claim | Result | Source Reference | Source Quote |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democrats are doing nothing but harboring criminals. | rejected | https://www.cornyn.senate.gov/news/cornyn-fact-checks-democrats-hysteria-on-deportations/ | To the Democrats who would decry these arrests, would you want these criminals to be your neighbor? I’m going to guess the answer’s no. |
| Democrats are doing nothing but harboring criminals. | rejected | https://newrepublic.com/article/189562/democrats-crime-problem-blame-media | Further aggravating this error, the article noted that fears about the bailout may have been misplaced because the rate of reoffending was remarkably low. But that was offered as the sole metric of success. There was no discussion of the affirmative good the bailout might have done: family dinners, parents at school events, mothers and children retaining and trying to rebuild the bonds that incarceration can fray. |
| Federal government should abolish sanctuary cities. | inconclusive | https://www.heritage.org/border-security/commentary/sanctuary-cities-thats-constitutional-hell-no | |
| Federal government should abolish sanctuary cities. | inconclusive | https://theconversation.com/trump-wants-to-cut-funding-to-sanctuary-cities-and-towns-but-they-dont-actually-violate-federal-law-255831 | |
| Federal government should abolish sanctuary cities. | rejected | https://www.usconstitution.net/sanctuary-cities-debate/ | These cases inform the ongoing debate about sanctuary cities, exploring the constitutional limits of federal influence over state activities. |
| Politicians who don't comply with abolishing sanctuary cities should be locked up. | rejected | https://oversight.house.gov/release/hearing-wrap-up-sanctuary-mayors-refuse-to-change-policies-that-obstruct-federal-immigration-enforcement-and-protect-dangerous-criminal-aliens/ | They concluded that Congress should also begin evaluating federal funding allocated to sanctuary cities and ensure mayors who defy federal immigration law are held accountable. |
| Politicians who don't comply with abolishing sanctuary cities should be locked up. | rejected | https://truthout.org/articles/after-failures-in-the-courts-the-gop-is-threatening-sanctuary-city-mayors/ | Still, throughout the day, GOP lawmakers attempted to paint sanctuary cities as unlawful, and several went so far as to suggest that all four mayors could face criminal prosecution. “Every one of you is exposed to criminal culpability here,” said Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Arizona), who also held up signs reading “sanctuary cities are illegal.” Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Florida), a fervent MAGA loyalist, outrageously claimed that she will refer the mayors to the DOJ) for prosecution. |
| Politicians who don't comply with abolishing sanctuary cities should be locked up. | rejected | https://www.usconstitution.net/sanctuary-cities-debate/ | New York v. United States (1992) strengthened state autonomy, ruling that forcing states to legislate according to federal command breached the Tenth Amendment. |
🤖 Conclusion [10/100]: The statement provided is highly inflammatory and largely incorrect according to the referenced sources. Claims that Democrats are "doing nothing but harboring criminals" are demonstrably false; while there are disagreements over immigration and crime policy, there is no evidence or credible reporting showing a party-wide policy of harboring criminals. The claim that the federal government should or could abolish sanctuary cities is evaluated as inconclusive in the sources, indicating ongoing legal and constitutional debates, but not settled policy or legal standing for abolition. Most notably, the claim that politicians who do not comply with abolishing sanctuary cities should be imprisoned is outright rejected: multiple references state there is no current legal basis or precedent for locking up elected officials over sanctuary city policies, and constitutional protections (like the Tenth Amendment) strongly limit federal power to dictate such local policies. In summary, the statement is almost entirely false and unsupported by any credible source, meriting a low truthfulness score.