Building Docker images from Dockerfiles using conventional package management systems can lead to unpredictable results due to several factors:
-
Version inconsistencies: Package managers often default to installing the latest versions of packages. If the Dockerfile doesn't specify exact versions, different builds at different times may pull in newer package versions, potentially introducing incompatibilities or unexpected behavior.
-
Repository changes: Package repositories can change over time. Packages may be updated, removed, or have their dependencies modified. This can lead to build failures or different package versions being installed in subsequent builds.
-
Caching issues: Docker uses a layer caching system to speed up builds. If a package is updated in the repository but the Docker cache still holds the old version, it may not pull the latest version unless forced to do so.
-
Network-dependent results: The build process relies on network access to download packages. Network issues or temporary outages in package repositories can lead to failed builds or incomplete package installations.
-
Non-deterministic build orders: Some package managers don't guarantee a consistent order of operations, which can occasionally lead to different results, especially with complex dependency trees.
-
Platform differences: Builds on different platforms or architectures might pull in different packages or versions to satisfy dependencies.
-
Transitive dependencies: Updates to transitive dependencies (dependencies of dependencies) can introduce changes or conflicts that are hard to predict or control.
-
Lack of lockfiles: Unlike some modern application-level package managers, system-level package managers used in Dockerfiles often don't use lockfiles to pin exact versions of all dependencies.