Update of proposal from this comment.
- Added by automation when it detects a breaking change from a previous GA API version
- Blocks merge until a "BreakingChange-Approved*" label is applied
- The changes to the REST API definition are not breaking at the REST API level and have at most minor impact to generated SDKs, so the change is allowed.
- Should only be applied by Breaking Change reviewer
- The changes to the REST API definition are correcting the definition to accurately describe the service behavior.
- This could be self-selected
- The PR describes actual breaking changes to the service.
- Should only be applied by Breaking Change reviewer
- This is the only case that triggers customer notifications, a 3 yr migration period (possibly shorter), etc.
- Within this set we may want to distinguish changes for security or legal compliance, which may be granted a shorter migration period.
- The PR contains breaking changes that were previously reviewed and approved.
- Should only be applied by Breaking Change reviewer (maybe open this up in the future)
- It is desirable but not mandatory to add a link the previously approved PR in a comment on this PR.
- Added by automation when it detects changes to an existing API version in a production branch, which violates the Azure versioning policy.
- Blocks merge until a "Versioning-Approved*" label is applied
- Changes to the REST API definition are not breaking at the REST API level and have at most minor impact to generated SDKs, so the change is allowed.
- Should only be applied by Breaking Change reviewer
- The changes to the REST API definition are correcting the definition to accurately describe the service behavior.
- This could be self-selected
- The API Version that triggered the review is in private preview, and non-breaking changes are permitted in the same API version during private preview.
- This could be self-selected.
- The API Version that triggered the review has not yet been released, despite having been merged to a production branch.
- This could be self-selected in the private repo only.
- The PR changes to an existing API version in a production branch but these changes were previously reviewed and approved.
- Should only be applied by Breaking Change reviewer (maybe open this up in the future)
- It is desirable but not mandatory to add a link the previously approved PR in a comment on this PR.
- I think this label will only apply for PRs to the public repo that were reviewed and approved in the private repo.