Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

@ruvnet
Last active June 21, 2025 12:46
Show Gist options
  • Save ruvnet/cc4bf2055b9455277a04ad0dc944e460 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Save ruvnet/cc4bf2055b9455277a04ad0dc944e460 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
QuDAG Vault is a Rust-based password and secret manager built on a quantum-resistant DAG architecture. It uses Kyber for key exchange, Dilithium for signatures, and AES-256-GCM for encrypting vault data. Secrets are stored as encrypted nodes in a DAG, enabling flexible organization, versioning, and delegation. It includes a CLI and bindings for …

Implementation Plan for QuDAG-Based Password Vault Library

Project Structure & Dependencies

We will organize the project as a Rust workspace with modular crates (following QuDAG’s architecture), ensuring separation of concerns and future extensibility. A suggested structure:

  • qudag-vault-core (library crate): Core vault logic and data structures. Integrates QuDAG modules for cryptography and DAG storage. Key dependencies:

    • QuDAG Crates: Use qudag-crypto for cryptographic primitives (Kyber KEM, Dilithium signatures, BLAKE3 hash) and qudag-dag for DAG data structures/consensus.
    • Cryptography: pqc_kyber (or via qudag-crypto) for Kyber key exchange; pqc_dilithium (or via qudag-crypto) for Dilithium signatures; aes-gcm (RustCrypto AEAD) for AES-256-GCM encryption; rand/getrandom for secure randomness.
    • KDF & Memory Safety: Use Argon2id (e.g. argon2 crate) to derive vault encryption keys from user passwords, and employ zeroize to clear sensitive material from memory.
    • Data Format: serde/serde_json to serialize the vault DAG (for export/import). The vault content will be stored encrypted (fields like passwords encrypted with AES-256-GCM), so exported data remains secure.
    • Logging & Error: thiserror for error definitions, and tracing for logging (for debugging/audit trails).
  • qudag-vault-cli (binary crate): Command-line interface for end-users, integrated into the existing QuDAG CLI framework. It will extend the qudag CLI with a vault command group (ensuring no conflicts with QuDAG’s current commands). Key dependencies:

    • clap (or QuDAG’s CLI utilities) for argument parsing and a consistent help system.
    • rpassword or similar for secure password prompts (to input master password without echo).
    • Relies on qudag-vault-core for all operations.
  • qudag-vault-node (Node.js addon, optional crate): Exposes core APIs to Node.js via N-API. We plan to use the napi-rs framework which allows building Node add-ons in Rust without needing node-gyp. This crate will create N-API bindings for the core Vault functions.

  • qudag-vault-python (Python module, optional crate): Exposes core APIs to Python. We will use PyO3 to wrap the Rust library as a Python extension, and maturin for building & publishing wheels (with support for pip or the faster uv tool for installation). The Python package (e.g. qudag_vault) will provide a high-level interface similar to the Rust API.

This modular layout aligns with QuDAG’s design philosophy of keeping cryptography, data (DAG), and interface layers separate. It ensures the vault system is QuDAG-native – reusing QuDAG’s quantum-resistant crypto and DAG mechanisms – and is structured for security and performance.

Rust API Design & Usage

The core of the library is a Vault struct providing high-level methods for vault operations. Internally, the vault maintains a DAG of encrypted secrets. Each secret (password entry) is a node in the DAG, which enables flexible relationships (e.g. an entry can belong to multiple categories or have multiple versions without cycles). The DAG structure leverages qudag-dag for efficient traversal and future consensus support. Basic operations include creating/opening a vault, adding secrets, retrieving secrets, and exporting/importing the vault data.

Cryptographic Design: When a new vault is created, a fresh symmetric vault key (256-bit) is generated to encrypt all secret data with AES-256-GCM (providing confidentiality and integrity). For a user-supplied master password, we derive a key with Argon2id (salted with a random salt) to encrypt the vault key. This way, the vault file contains an encrypted vault key and an encrypted DAG of secrets. On vault open, the master password decrypts the vault key (via Argon2id and AES-GCM), then the vault key decrypts individual secrets.

To integrate Post-Quantum security, we incorporate Kyber and Dilithium from QuDAG’s crypto suite. For example, when storing or sharing a vault in a client-server or multi-user scenario, the vault key can be wrapped with Kyber KEM: one can encapsulate the vault key with a user’s Kyber public key, so only their private key decapsulates it. Similarly, Dilithium may be used to sign vault contents or audit logs to ensure integrity/authenticity (especially in enterprise settings). While a single-user local vault might not require KEM exchange, our API is designed to accommodate hybrid encryption: e.g., an optional method Vault::share(pubkey) could produce an encapsulated vault key for that public key (enabling secure vault sharing). All cryptographic operations use quantum-resistant primitives provided by QuDAG (Kyber, Dilithium, BLAKE3), aligning with QuDAG’s security standards. We also mirror QuDAG’s best practices by using strong hashing (BLAKE3) and wiping sensitive data from memory after use (via zeroize).

Vault DAG Structure: Secrets are stored as nodes in a directed acyclic graph. For example, a “category” or folder can be a node that points to secret entry nodes, and an entry could have edges to multiple categories (making the structure a DAG rather than a simple tree). We maintain a special root node representing the vault itself; traversing the DAG from the root (or from a category node) yields all accessible secrets (this is the “DAG traversal” functionality in the API). The DAG can also record version history: each update to a secret can create a new node linked from the previous version node, allowing non-linear history (particularly useful if multiple users edit concurrently, creating branches to be resolved). The Vault API provides functions to navigate this graph (e.g. list children of a node, find a node by label, etc.). In the initial implementation, with a single user, DAG traversal is used for organizing and listing secrets (e.g. listing all secrets in a category by traversing that subgraph).

Below is a sketch of the Rust API with key methods and an example of usage:

// Core Vault data structures (simplified)
pub struct Vault {
    // Encrypted DAG of secrets; each node contains encrypted payload and metadata.
    dag: Dag<SecretNode>,            // SecretNode includes encrypted secret data
    master_hash: [u8; 32],           // Hash of master password (to verify on open)
    encrypted_vault_key: Vec<u8>,    // Vault key (AES key) encrypted with master key
    public_key: Option<KyberPublic>, // Optional PQC keys for sharing (Kyber public key)
    private_key: Option<KyberSecret>,
    // ... other fields like vault identifier, salt for KDF, etc.
}

// Each secret entry (node data in the DAG)
pub struct SecretEntry {
    pub label: String,        // e.g. "email/github"
    pub username: String,
    pub password: String,     // plaintext (when decrypted in memory)
    // ... perhaps other fields, e.g. URL, notes.
}

// Public API methods
impl Vault {
    /// Initialize a new vault, generating keys and an empty DAG.
    pub fn create(path: &str, master_password: &str) -> Result<Self, VaultError> { ... }

    /// Open an existing vault from storage, decrypting the vault key using the master password.
    pub fn open(path: &str, master_password: &str) -> Result<Self, VaultError> { ... }

    /// Add a new secret to the vault DAG. Optionally generates a password if not provided.
    pub fn add_secret(&mut self, label: &str, username: &str, password: Option<&str>) -> Result<(), VaultError> { ... }

    /// Retrieve a secret entry by its label (or node ID). Decrypts and returns the secret.
    pub fn get_secret(&self, label: &str) -> Result<SecretEntry, VaultError> { ... }

    /// List all secret labels or traverse a category node to list its children.
    pub fn list_secrets(&self, category: Option<&str>) -> Result<Vec<String>, VaultError> { ... }

    /// Export the entire vault DAG (including all nodes and relationships) to a file.
    /// The exported file remains encrypted (suitable for backup or transfer).
    pub fn export(&self, output_path: &str) -> Result<(), VaultError> { ... }

    /// Import a previously exported DAG, merging it into this vault (or replacing current vault).
    pub fn import(&mut self, input_path: &str) -> Result<(), VaultError> { ... }

    /// (Advanced) Generate a new random password using secure RNG and configurable rules.
    pub fn generate_password(&self, length: usize, charset: Charset) -> String { ... }

    /// (Future/Optional) Share vault or secret: encapsulate vault key for a recipient's public key.
    pub fn export_vault_key_for(&self, recipient_pub: &KyberPublic) -> Result<EncryptedKey, VaultError> { ... }
}

Example usage of the Rust API:

use qudag_vault_core::Vault;

// Create a new vault with a master password
let mut vault = Vault::create("vault.qdag", "CorrectHorseBatteryStaple")?;  
vault.add_secret("email/google", "[email protected]", Some("Pa$$w0rd"))?;    // Add a secret
vault.add_secret("server/root", "root", None)?;  // Add a secret, letting library generate a random password
let secret = vault.get_secret("email/google")?;
println!("Retrieved password for {}: {}", secret.username, secret.password);
vault.export("vault_export.dat")?;              // Export encrypted DAG to file

// Later, or on another machine
let mut vault2 = Vault::open("vault.qdag", "CorrectHorseBatteryStaple")?;  
vault2.import("vault_export.dat")?;            // Import secrets from backup
let list = vault2.list_secrets(None)?;         // List all secret labels

In this API, errors are handled via a VaultError enum (covering cases like incorrect password, I/O errors, cryptographic failures, etc.). The API ensures that plaintext secrets only live in memory transiently: e.g. get_secret decrypts data into a SecretEntry which implements Drop to zeroize the password field. The DAG traversal functions (list_secrets, etc.) operate on metadata (labels, node relationships) and do not decrypt passwords unless explicitly requested, which improves performance and security (only decrypt what is needed).

CLI Command Integration

We will integrate vault functionality into the existing QuDAG CLI (qudag command) as a new subcommand category. This ensures users have a one-stop tool and that our commands follow the same style and parsing rules as QuDAG’s CLI. Using the Clap library (already likely used in QuDAG CLI), we add a vault command with subcommands for each vault operation:

  • qudag vault init [<vault-path>] – Initialize a new vault. This will prompt the user for a master password (with confirmation) if not provided via flag. It then calls Vault::create to generate the vault file (default path could be ~/.qudag/vault.qdag if not specified). On success, outputs a message like “Vault created at ”. (If the file already exists, it will warn or require --force.)

  • qudag vault open <vault-path> – (If needed for persistent session) Opens a vault and optionally caches the unlocked vault in memory for subsequent commands. However, since CLI tools are typically stateless, we will likely open the vault on each operation command instead. This subcommand might simply verify that the vault can be opened with the given password. In practice, the user will run qudag vault add/get directly with the password prompt, so an explicit open may not be necessary.

  • qudag vault add <label> – Add a new secret. The CLI will prompt for username and password (with an option to generate a random password). For example: qudag vault add "email/google" will ask for username (e.g. [email protected]) and either prompt for a password or accept --generate flag to create one. This invokes Vault::add_secret and on success prints a confirmation (and if a password was generated, perhaps displays it or offers to copy to clipboard, with a warning to save it).

  • qudag vault get <label> – Retrieve a secret’s details. This will open the vault (prompt for the master password if not already provided via an environment variable or config), then call Vault::get_secret(label). The password is sensitive, so the CLI can either display it in the console (with a big warning about visibility) or optionally copy it to clipboard if the environment allows (for security, we might integrate with an OS-specific clipboard utility). By default, it might output the username and password in a formatted way (or JSON if --format json is specified, aligning with QuDAG CLI’s support for JSON output).

  • qudag vault list [<category>] – List stored secret labels, either all or under a specified category (if the vault uses categories in labels like "category/name"). This calls Vault::list_secrets and prints the results (e.g. as a simple list, or a tree if showing category hierarchy). This helps users discover what entries exist without printing sensitive data.

  • qudag vault export <file> – Export the vault’s DAG to a file. This uses Vault::export, writing an encrypted representation of the entire DAG. The CLI will ensure the output file is created with appropriate permissions. After exporting, it prints a success message like “Vault exported to backup.qdag”. (We emphasize that the export is still encrypted with the vault key, so it’s safe to transport, but only accessible with the master password.)

  • qudag vault import <file> – Import a previously exported DAG file. This opens the current vault (prompts for master password), then calls Vault::import to merge or load the secrets from the file. The CLI may ask for confirmation if importing into a non-empty vault (to avoid accidental overwrites). On success, it lists how many secrets were imported or merged.

  • (Optional) qudag vault genpw [--length N] [--symbols] ... – A utility command to generate a random password (using the same generator as in the library). This can help users create passwords for other uses. It would output a generated password to stdout. (This is a user-facing “key generation” feature, complementing the library’s generate_password.)

The CLI integration will aim for a consistent user experience. All commands will support a -v/--verbose flag and proper error handling: for example, if a vault is not found or an incorrect password is entered, the CLI prints a clear error. We will reuse QuDAG CLI’s infrastructure for parsing and output formatting. QuDAG’s CLI already has a structured help and JSON output system; our vault commands will plug into that (e.g. by returning data that the CLI can format as table or JSON). This means implementing our subcommands likely in the QuDAG CLI’s commands.rs file, under a vault-related module.

Example CLI usage:

$ qudag vault init 
Enter master password: **** 
Confirm password: **** 
[+] Vault initialized at ~/.qudag/vault.qdag

$ qudag vault add "email/work"
Enter username: [email protected]
Enter password (leave blank to generate): 
[+] Generated password: X7#V... (copied to clipboard)
[+] Secret "email/work" added to vault.

$ qudag vault list
Secrets in vault:
 - email/google
 - email/work
 - server/root

$ qudag vault get email/google
Username: [email protected]
Password: Pa$$w0rd

$ qudag vault export backup.qdag 
[+] Vault DAG exported to "backup.qdag"

(These commands will all invoke the underlying Rust API; the state (vault contents) is not persisted in memory between commands unless we implement a daemon, so each command opens the vault file anew. In the future, we might run a background vault service for performance, but initially the simplicity of stateless CLI is acceptable.)

Node.js and Python SDK Integration

To support external integration, we will provide lightweight SDKs for Node.js and Python that wrap the Rust library via FFI:

  • Node.js (N-API Addon): We will create a Node addon using Node-API (N-API). Using the napi-rs crate, we can expose Rust functions/classes to JavaScript in a high-level way. We’ll expose a Vault class in Node that mirrors the Rust API. For instance, the Rust methods Vault::create, open, add_secret, etc., will be available as methods on the Node Vault object. Under the hood, the Node addon will manage a pointer to a Rust Vault instance and ensure proper memory management.

    Example: In Rust (within qudag-vault-node crate) we might write:

    #[napi]
    pub struct Vault {
        inner: qudag_vault_core::Vault
    }
    
    #[napi]
    impl Vault {
        #[napi(factory)]
        pub fn create(path: String, master_password: String) -> Result<Vault> {
            let vault = qudag_vault_core::Vault::create(&path, &master_password)
                .map_err(|e| napi::Error::from_reason(e.to_string()))?;
            Ok(Vault { inner: vault })
        }
    
        #[napi(factory)]
        pub fn open(path: String, master_password: String) -> Result<Vault> { ... }
    
        #[napi]
        pub fn add_secret(&mut self, label: String, username: String, password: Option<String>) -> Result<()> { ... }
    
        #[napi]
        pub fn get_secret(&self, label: String) -> Result<SecretEntry> { ... }
    
        // ... and so on for list_secrets, export, import.
    }

    This will compile into a .node binary that can be required by Node.js. We will also provide TypeScript definitions for the module (napi-rs can generate these, or we manually write a .d.ts). The Node API might simplify some aspects: e.g. returning a JS object for get_secret with fields {label, username, password}.

    To distribute, we can precompile binaries for common platforms or use neon/napi build tools so that npm install compiles it. External developers can then do:

    const { Vault } = require('qudag-vault');
    let vault = Vault.create("vault.qdag", "Secret123");
    vault.add_secret("web/facebook", "alice_fb", "fb_password");
    let secret = vault.get_secret("web/facebook");
    console.log(secret.password);

    This enables Node.js applications or Electron apps to leverage the vault securely. (We’ll ensure that exceptions map to JS errors and that no sensitive data is accidentally copied into long-lived JS strings.)

  • Python (PyO3 Module): We will expose the library as a Python package named (for example) qudag_vault. Using PyO3, we can create Python classes/functions that wrap our Rust API. The #[pyclass] and #[pymethods] macros will help create a Python Vault class.

    For instance:

    #[pyclass]
    struct Vault {
        inner: qudag_vault_core::Vault
    }
    
    #[pymethods]
    impl Vault {
        #[new]
        fn py_new(path: &str, master_password: &str) -> PyResult<Self> {
            let vault = qudag_vault_core::Vault::open(path, master_password)
                .map_err(|e| PyErr::new::<pyo3::exceptions::PyValueError, _>(format!("{}", e)))?;
            Ok(Vault { inner: vault })
        }
    
        fn add_secret(&mut self, label: &str, username: &str, password: Option<&str>) -> PyResult<()> { ... }
    
        fn get_secret(&self, label: &str) -> PyResult<(String, String, String)> { 
            // return (label, username, password) tuple
        }
    
        // ... list_secrets, export, import similarly ...
    }

    In this design, creating a Vault instance in Python will automatically call open (or we can provide separate classmethods for create/open if needed). We will also consider security aspects like not exposing raw bytes of encrypted data in Python unnecessarily.

    We’ll package this with maturin, which allows building and publishing Python wheels easily. We can publish to PyPI so users can pip install qudag_vault. Maturin can be integrated in CI to build for Windows, Mac, Linux (manylinux) ensuring broad compatibility. The new uv tool (a fast Python package manager written in Rust) can also be used to install or publish our package.

    Example usage in Python:

    import qudag_vault
    vault = qudag_vault.Vault("vault.qdag", master_password="Secret123")  # opens existing vault
    vault.add_secret("email/google", "[email protected]", "Pa$$w0rd")
    user, username, password = vault.get_secret("email/google")
    print(f"Password for {username} is {password}")
    vault.export("backup.qdag")

Both SDKs are “basic” in that they expose the primary functionality. As the Rust core evolves, these wrappers can be extended. We ensure that these bindings remain thin and mostly just pass through to the Rust core (to maintain a single source of truth for logic and crypto). This also means improvements in the Rust library (performance or security) benefit all language bindings automatically.

Security note: We will document for Node/Python users that the master password might be needed each time (unless they choose to cache it) and that secrets, once retrieved, reside in the respective runtime’s memory. For Python, we may provide a method to wipe a returned secret or design the API to avoid returning the plaintext directly (for example, a method to copy it to clipboard or to a file descriptor), depending on demand. Initially, straightforward returning of the secret is implemented, with the expectation that higher-level applications will handle it carefully.

Roadmap: Enterprise Features & Optimizations

The initial implementation focuses on core features, but the design is modular to support advanced enterprise requirements. Future phases will introduce:

  • Biometric Unlock & MFA: We plan to integrate biometric multi-factor authentication for unlocking the vault. For example, on platforms with biometric APIs (Windows Hello, Touch ID, etc.), the vault could store the master key in the OS secure enclave, unlockable only via biometric verification. The library could provide hooks to supply an additional decryption key from a biometric device or YubiKey. This will be built as an optional module (so consumer users can use a simple password, while enterprise deployments can require biometric or hardware 2FA to decrypt the vault).

  • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): For enterprise team vaults, we will support multiple users with different roles and permissions on subsets of secrets. This entails each secret or node in the DAG having an access control list or a policy tag. The vault could be extended to manage multiple encryption keys: e.g. per-team or per-entry keys that are themselves encrypted with each authorized user’s public key. A user with read-only role might get a decryption key but not the ability to create new secrets (which could be enforced by not sharing writing capabilities). We will integrate with corporate identity systems by allowing mapping of user identities to Dilithium public keys (each user in an enterprise has a keypair; their Dilithium pubkey can serve as their identity for signing operations). The vault operations can then require a valid signature from a user with the right role for modifications, and all changes can be verified. This approach leverages QuDAG’s PQC identity primitives and ensures only authorized parties can access or modify secrets.

  • Audit Logging: Logging every vault access and change is crucial in enterprise settings. We will implement a secure audit log where each event (e.g. secret viewed or modified, user added, vault exported) is recorded. To ensure tamper-evidence, the audit log itself can be implemented as an append-only DAG or blockchain: each log entry could be a node in a log DAG, signed by the actor’s Dilithium key and linked to the previous entry. This chain of signatures and hashes makes the log immutable and verifiable. The log can be stored encrypted within the vault or separately (viewable by auditors with a special key). In integration with QuDAG, we may even utilize the QuDAG network to timestamp or replicate logs (for example, publishing hash of log entries to the QuDAG network for distributed integrity). Administrators will be able to query the audit trail (e.g. via CLI or an API, with appropriate permissions).

  • Secure Delegation & Sharing: We will add capabilities to share secrets or vault access securely with third parties. Secure delegation means a user can grant someone else one-time or time-limited access to a secret without revealing their master password or giving full vault access. This can be achieved by using hybrid encryption: for instance, generate a one-time AES key for the secret, encrypt the secret with it, then use the delegate’s Kyber public key to encapsulate that AES key. The delegate can decapsulate with their private key and decrypt the secret. This process can be automated by a command like qudag vault delegate <label> --to <recipient> which outputs a package that can be sent to the recipient (who can use their key to open it, perhaps via their own vault instance). We will also allow delegates to be pre-defined (e.g. an emergency access user who has a pre-shared piece of the vault key, unlocked via Shamir Secret Sharing or similar scheme – an advanced feature for disaster recovery).

  • Performance & Scalability Optimizations: As the vault grows (in entries or users), we will optimize performance. Potential improvements include using a database backend (SQLite or RocksDB) instead of a single file for faster queries on large vaults – note QuDAG already includes RocksDB and SQLx in dependencies which we can leverage for persistent storage of DAG nodes. We will also optimize cryptographic operations by using SIMD and parallelism where possible (e.g. bulk decrypting multiple secrets can be done in parallel threads). QuDAG’s metrics show optimized performance for its crypto (e.g. Kyber decapsulation ~1.12 ms) – we will inherit these benefits and continue to profile our library with tools like criterion benchmarks. If needed, we can cache derived keys (for example, cache the Argon2-derived master key in memory while the vault is open, to avoid redoing the KDF on every operation) – protected by memory encryption or enclave on supported hardware.

  • Distributed Vault & Consensus: In the long term, a truly novel feature would be to allow a vault to be distributed across multiple nodes using QuDAG’s DAG-based consensus. In an enterprise cluster or a peer-to-peer use case, multiple QuDAG nodes could hold copies of the encrypted vault and propagate updates via the QuDAG network. QuDAG’s Avalanche-based DAG consensus could ensure all nodes agree on the latest vault state in a quantum-resistant way. Conflict resolution (if two updates happen concurrently) would be handled by the consensus mechanism, providing eventual consistency without a central server. This would effectively create a decentralized password manager network – aligning with QuDAG’s vision of an anonymous, distributed infrastructure. While this is a complex feature, our initial design (using the DAG for internal structure and PQC for sharing) lays the groundwork for such extension.

  • Continuous Security Audits & Hardening: We will subject the vault system to rigorous security testing. This includes formal audits of the cryptographic implementations, fuzz testing for parsing/serialization (especially on import/export), and utilizing tools like cargo audit to monitor dependencies for vulnerabilities. We will keep the library up-to-date with evolving PQC standards; for instance, if NIST releases new versions or recommends algorithm tweaks, the modular design allows swapping out or upgrading algorithms with minimal impact on the overall system.

  • User Experience Improvements: Although the initial focus is CLI and programmatic use, we anticipate adding a GUI or browser extension for broader adoption. The core library will remain in Rust, but we might create bindings for web (via WebAssembly, given our Rust code can compile to WASM) to use the vault in browser contexts securely. Enterprise features like SSO integration (e.g. unlocking the vault via OAuth2 corporate login) can be layered on by having an external authentication step that then supplies the decryption key to the library.

In summary, this implementation plan provides a secure, QuDAG-aligned foundation for password management. By leveraging QuDAG’s quantum-resistant crypto and DAG architecture, we achieve a system that is future-proof against quantum threats and structurally prepared for distributed operation. The initial version delivers all core features (vault creation, secret storage/retrieval, CLI and SDK access, encrypted backup) with a strong emphasis on security (AES-256-GCM encryption via PQC-protected keys, memory safety, clear role separation). The project’s modular nature will allow us to incorporate enterprise requirements like MFA, RBAC, auditing, and secure sharing in iterative phases without major redesign. Each future feature will be implemented in accordance with QuDAG’s principles of security and anonymity, ensuring the vault system remains robust and extensible for years to come.

Sources:

  • QuDAG Protocol documentation and architecture
  • PQC algorithm implementations (Kyber, Dilithium, etc.) in QuDAG
  • QuDAG CLI design and features
  • napi-rs and PyO3/maturin for multi-language integration
  • Security best practices (zeroizing secrets, etc.)
  • QuDAG consensus mechanism (for potential distributed vault)

-- qudag-vault-workspace/ # Root workspace for all QuDAG Vault modules ├── Cargo.toml # Workspace manifest listing member crates ├── Cargo.lock # Locked dependency versions ├── README.md # High-level overview and quickstart ├── .gitignore # Ignored files (build artifacts, credentials) ├── scripts/ # Helper scripts │ ├── build_all.sh # Build all Rust crates, Node and Python SDKs │ └── release.sh # Release to crates.io, npm, and PyPI └── crates/ # Individual Rust crates ├── qudag-vault-core/ # Core library: DAG, crypto, vault logic │ ├── Cargo.toml # Core crate manifest │ ├── README.md # Core API documentation and examples │ ├── src/
│ │ ├── lib.rs # Exports public API and re-exports modules │ │ ├── vault.rs # Vault struct and main methods │ │ ├── secret.rs # SecretEntry and node-level types │ │ ├── dag.rs # DAG data structures and traversal helpers │ │ ├── crypto.rs # Kyber KEM, Dilithium signing, AES-GCM wrappers │ │ ├── kdf.rs # Argon2id password-based key derivation │ │ ├── errors.rs # VaultError definitions │ │ └── utils.rs # Helper functions (serialization, zeroize) │ └── tests/
│ ├── vault_tests.rs # Unit tests for vault operations │ └── crypto_tests.rs # Tests for PQC and AEAD primitives │ ├── qudag-vault-cli/ # CLI binary: integrates with qudag command │ ├── Cargo.toml # CLI crate manifest │ ├── README.md # CLI usage guide and examples │ └── src/ │ ├── main.rs # CLI entry point (qudag vault ...) │ ├── commands.rs # init, add, get, list, export, import │ └── output.rs # Formatting, logging, JSON support │ ├── qudag-vault-node/ # Node.js SDK: N-API bindings │ ├── Cargo.toml # N-API addon manifest │ ├── package.json # npm package metadata │ ├── README.md # Node.js usage guide and API docs │ └── src/ │ ├── lib.rs # napi-rs binding code exposing Vault class │ └── binding.rs # JavaScript-friendly wrappers and type conversions │ └── qudag-vault-python/ # Python SDK: PyO3 extension module ├── Cargo.toml # PyO3 crate manifest ├── pyproject.toml # Python packaging metadata (maturin) ├── README.md # Python usage guide and API docs ├── src/ │ └── qudag_vault/ │ ├── init.py # Python package initializer │ ├── vault.py # Vault class wrappers and methods │ └── exceptions.py # Python exception definitions mapping VaultError └── tests/ └── test_vault.py
# Python unit tests for qudag_vault API

Here is a step-by-step swarm plan—built on your SPARC-enabled Claude-flow framework—to orchestrate parallel agents for the QuDAG vault library. Each phase spawns specialized sub-agents, runs in parallel where possible, and converges via a coordinator. Replace placeholders (<…>) with your repo paths or config as needed.


1. Initialize the Swarm

npx claude-flow@latest init \
  --sparc \
  --name qudag-vault-swarm \
  --repo https://github.com/ruvnet/claude-code-flow

This sets up a SPARC-style swarm named qudag-vault-swarm in your Claude-flow workspace.


2. Specification Phase

Spawn a Specification Agent to define requirements.

Task(RequirementSpecAgent):
  Role: specification
  Prompt: |
    Draft a detailed spec for a Rust-based QuDAG vault library.
      • Core features: vault create/open, add/get/list secrets
      • Crypto: Argon2id KDF, AES-256-GCM, Kyber KEM wrap, Dilithium signatures
      • Data model: DAG of encrypted nodes with versioning
      • CLI commands: init, add, get, list, export, import
      • SDKs: Node.js (napi-rs), Python (PyO3/maturin)
    Output: JSON schema of APIs, data formats, CLI flags.

3. Pseudocode Phase

Spawn a Pseudocode Agent in parallel.

Task(PseudocodeAgent):
  Role: pseudocode
  Prompt: |
    Based on the spec JSON, write high-level pseudocode for:
      1. Vault struct lifecycle (create/open)
      2. Secret node add/get/list
      3. Export/import logic
      4. Encryption key derivation and wrapping
    Organize pseudocode by module: vault_core, crypto, dag, cli, sdk_node, sdk_python.
    Output: Annotated pseudocode files per module.

4. Architecture Phase

Spawn an Architecture Agent.

Task(ArchitectureAgent):
  Role: architecture
  Prompt: |
    Design the Rust workspace tree and Cargo.toml layout.
    For each crate, list dependencies and feature flags.
    Show the call graph: how vault_core → qudag-crypto → aes-gcm → pqc_kyber connects.
    Include sample `napi-rs` and `PyO3` build settings.
    Output: `tree.txt` of file/folder layout with dependency graph.

5. Implementation Phase (Parallel)

Spawn specialized implementers in parallel:

Task(CryptoAgent):
  Role: code
  Prompt: |
    Implement `crypto.rs` wrappers:
      – Argon2id KDF
      – AES-256-GCM encrypt/decrypt
      – Kyber keypair / encapsulate / decapsulate
      – Dilithium sign/verify
    Include unit tests for each primitive.

Task(DagAgent):
  Role: code
  Prompt: |
    Build `dag.rs` using `qudag-dag`:
      – Node struct for SecretEntry
      – Traversal helpers
      – Version branching support
    Include tests for acyclicity and traversal.

Task(CoreAgent):
  Role: code
  Prompt: |
    Implement `vault.rs`:
      – Vault::create/open
      – add_secret, get_secret, list_secrets
      – export/import
    Integrate crypto and DAG modules.

Task(CliAgent):
  Role: code
  Prompt: |
    Extend `qudag` CLI:
      – Add `vault` subcommand group with init, add, get, list, export, import
      – Secure password prompts
      – JSON or table output formatting
    Include tests for CLI flag parsing.

Task(NodeSdkAgent):
  Role: code
  Prompt: |
    Create `qudag-vault-node` using napi-rs:
      – Expose Vault class with methods create, open, add, get, list, export, import
      – Generate TypeScript definitions
    Include simple example usage.

Task(PythonSdkAgent):
  Role: code
  Prompt: |
    Create PyO3 module `qudag_vault`:
      – Expose Vault class with __new__, add_secret, get_secret, list_secrets, export, import
      – Configure maturin for wheel builds
    Include Python unit tests.

All implementers run concurrently. Each writes code files under crates/<crate-name>/src.


6. Coordination & Merge

Task(CoordinatorAgent):
  Role: refinement
  Dependencies:
    - RequirementSpecAgent
    - PseudocodeAgent
    - ArchitectureAgent
    - CryptoAgent
    - DagAgent
    - CoreAgent
    - CliAgent
    - NodeSdkAgent
    - PythonSdkAgent
  Prompt: |
    1. Merge module outputs into workspace tree.
    2. Detect spec-pseudocode mismatches.
    3. Run `cargo test` and fail fast on compile or test errors.
    4. Validate CLI examples and SDK examples compile and pass smoke tests.
    5. Generate a report of inconsistencies or failures.
    6. Propose fixes or clarification questions.

7. Refinement Loops

Spawn a Reflection Agent to address Coordinator’s report:

Task(ReflectionAgent):
  Role: reflection
  Prompt: |
    For each failure or inconsistency in the coordinator report:
      – Identify root cause (spec mismatch, missing import, test error)
      – Propose code changes or spec updates
    Output: Patch suggestions in unified diff format.

Apply patches, then re-run CoordinatorAgent until all tests pass.


8. Completion Phase

Task(AssemblyAgent):
  Role: completion
  Prompt: |
    1. Generate final README.md with quickstart for Rust, CLI, Node, Python.
    2. Bump versions in Cargo.toml, package.json, pyproject.toml.
    3. Create GitHub Actions CI pipeline:
       – Rust build & test matrix
       – npm publish on tag
       – maturin publish wheels on tag
    4. Tag release v0.1.0 and prepare changelog.

9. Next-Phase Roadmap

After v0.1.0, spawn targeted agents for:

  • Biometric MFA integration
  • Enterprise RBAC & policy agents
  • Audit log DAG agent
  • Distributed vault consensus agent

This swarm plan leverages your Claude-flow SPARC pattern to parallelize domain-specific work, maintain strict coordination, and deliver a tested, multi-language QuDAG vault library end to end. Let me know if you’d like example prompts or further granularity in any phase.

Dual-Mode Streamable Model Context Protocol (MCP) Design

Overview

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open standard that connects language models to external tools and data in a structured way. Think of MCP as the “USB-C of AI integrations”: it provides a uniform interface for LLMs (like Claude) to plug into databases, APIs, local files, etc. Our goal is to design an MCP implementation that works in two modes – as a local STDIO service for CLI tools, and as an HTTP streaming service – while maintaining a unified message format and context-aware, stateful communication between agents or modules. This protocol will enable multiple AI agents (in a Claude-code-flow environment) or distributed nodes (in a QuDAG network) to exchange messages with rich context, progressive updates, and strong security.

Key design goals include:

  • Structured messaging with a consistent framing format (based on JSON) for both STDIO and HTTP.
  • Context-aware message metadata (each message carries context like session, agent identity, etc., to manage multi-agent workflows).
  • Progressive streaming updates so agents can send partial results or ongoing progress.
  • Async and bidirectional communication to support agent-initiated messages (reflection, alerts) and concurrent updates.
  • Security by design, including optional quantum-safe encryption and signing of messages (Kyber/Dilithium), especially in a distributed DAG setting.
  • Extensibility to new capabilities (future tools, agent runtime integration, or swarm orchestration) without breaking compatibility.

Below we detail the MCP message format and framing, how streaming and async updates are handled, sketches for STDIO and HTTP implementations (with Rust examples), security considerations (encrypted payloads, DAG signing), and how the design supports future agentic runtimes or swarms.

Message Framing and Streaming Format

MCP uses a structured message format based on JSON-RPC 2.0, ensuring every message has a clear type and ID. This framing provides a lightweight envelope for requests, responses, and notifications:

  • Requests: JSON objects with an id, a method name, and parameters (params). The method describes an action or query (e.g. fetching data, invoking a tool).
  • Responses: JSON objects with the matching id and either a result (on success) or an error (with code/message). Each request yields at most one final response.
  • Notifications: JSON objects with a method and params but no id. These are one-way messages for events or updates that don’t expect a reply.

Framing: In STDIO mode, messages are sent over a byte stream. We adopt the standard practice of prefixing each JSON message with a length header (e.g. Content-Length: N followed by \r\n\r\n), similar to Language Server Protocol framing. This ensures the receiver can delineate message boundaries on a raw stream. In HTTP mode, each JSON-RPC message is sent in the HTTP body (for requests) or as part of an event stream (for responses), described below. JSON encoding keeps messages human-readable and easy to debug.

Streaming Responses: MCP supports streaming for long-running or incremental results. A server can choose to break a large result into a sequence of smaller messages (e.g. stream chunks of a generated text, or intermediate progress updates). In JSON-RPC terms, the server may send multiple partial responses for one request via notifications or SSE events, then a final response to mark completion. Over HTTP, this is achieved with Server-Sent Events (SSE): the server sets Content-Type: text/event-stream and sends a stream of JSON-RPC messages as events. Each SSE event contains one JSON message (often a notification for partial data, and eventually the final response). Over STDIO, the server can simply write multiple JSON messages back-to-back – the client will process each in turn. For example, a long database query might first stream a “processing started” notification, then a series of result chunk notifications, and finally a response indicating completion.

Message Example: A typical JSON-RPC request in MCP might look like:

{ 
  "jsonrpc": "2.0", 
  "id": "42", 
  "method": "searchDatabase", 
  "params": { "query": "SELECT * FROM Products WHERE price > 100" } 
}

If the result is large, the server could reply with an SSE stream (HTTP) or sequential STDIO messages like:

{ "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "partial", "params": { "batch": [ ... ] } }
{ "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "partial", "params": { "batch": [ ... ] } }
{ "jsonrpc": "2.0", "id": "42", "result": { "done": true, "totalItems": 500 } }

Here we use a convention: intermediate chunks come as method: "partial" notifications (no id), and the final response carries the original id to complete the request. This is just one design approach for progressive results; the protocol could also label partial outputs via an "update": true flag in the payload, etc. The framing ensures all JSON messages are self-describing and can be parsed in sequence.

Asynchronous Updates and Agent Reflection

Asynchronous communication is a first-class feature of MCP. Servers can send out-of-band notifications or even requests back to the client asynchronously (for example, to signal an internal event or request additional input). The protocol’s use of JSON-RPC (which supports notifications and client-to-server requests) means either side can initiate messages at any time, not just as a strict request-response sequence. This is crucial for multi-agent systems where agents might act autonomously or “reflect” on their own outputs.

Progress Updates: The protocol supports progress and status updates through notifications. For instance, an agent performing a long computation could send periodic "progress" notifications (e.g. {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"progress","params":{"percent": 50}}) to update the host on its state. These async messages keep the system context in sync, and the host can render progress bars or logs to the user.

Agent Reflection: “Reflection” refers to an agent’s ability to analyze and adjust its behavior based on intermediate results or feedback. MCP can facilitate this by allowing an agent to send itself or a peer agent special messages. For example, after producing an answer, an agent could issue a “self-reflection” request: method: "reflect", containing its reasoning log or asking a verification module to double-check the answer. The protocol does not hard-code specific reflection behaviors, but it provides the flexibility to implement them via custom methods or tool calls. Because messages carry contextual metadata (like an id, agent identity, timestamps, etc.), an agent can link reflections to specific prior messages or state.

Concurrent and Bidirectional Messaging: In a Claude-flow swarm scenario, many agents may be running in parallel. MCP’s async design allows multiple responses to be in-flight simultaneously. Each JSON-RPC message has an id to correlate replies, so agents can handle interwoven dialogues without confusion. One agent can fire off multiple requests to different MCP servers (or other agents) and handle their responses as they arrive. Conversely, servers can initiate callbacks – e.g., an MCP server might send a request to the client to ask for additional permission or data. The event stream design of HTTP transport even lets servers push notifications to clients outside the context of a specific request (for example, a file-watcher tool could notify of file changes spontaneously).

To manage all this, the protocol may attach contextual metadata to messages such as: a session ID, agent ID, or parent message ID. This metadata helps maintain state synchronization across agents. For instance, an agent reflection message might include a reference to the message it is reflecting on. In a DAG-based system, these references naturally form links (edges) in the conversation graph. The protocol’s flexibility with JSON payloads means we can add fields like "context": {"prior": "<msg-hash>"} or define specialized methods for cross-references as needed.

Importantly, the transport layer supports reliability features for async updates. SSE streams, for example, can tag events with incremental IDs and allow clients to resume a stream after disconnection by sending the last seen event ID. This means even if a network hiccup occurs, an agent can reconnect and catch up on missed asynchronous notifications, keeping state in sync. Overall, MCP’s design empowers dynamic agent workflows: agents can reflect, collaborate, and update each other continuously through a shared protocol.

STDIO Implementation (CLI Tools Sketch)

For local command-line (CLI) tools or modules, MCP can run over simple STDIN/STDOUT pipes. In this mode, the MCP server is just a process (for example, a Python or Rust program) that reads JSON-RPC messages from STDIN and writes responses to STDOUT. The host (e.g. Claude Desktop or another orchestrator) acts as the MCP client, launching the process and communicating via its stdio streams.

How it works: When the CLI tool starts, it performs any necessary initialization (optionally sending an MCP "initialize" handshake message to declare its capabilities). After that, the host can send requests. Each request is written as a JSON text to the process’s STDIN, framed by length. The tool reads and parses the JSON, performs the action, and writes back a JSON result to STDOUT. This loop continues, allowing multiple calls over the same long-lived process (maintaining state between calls if needed). The connection is stateful – the tool can store context in memory (caches, database connections, etc.) and reuse it for subsequent requests, which is more efficient than one-shot scripts.

Example (Pseudo-code): A simple Python MCP server might look like:

import sys, json
for line in sys.stdin:
    msg = json.loads(line)
    if "method" in msg:
        if msg["method"] == "echo":
            response = {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id": msg["id"], "result": msg["params"]["text"]}
        # ... handle other methods ...
        print(json.dumps(response), flush=True)

The host would send {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"echo","params":{"text":"Hello"}} to STDIN, and get back {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"result":"Hello"} on STDOUT.

Progressive Output: Even in STDIO mode, streaming is possible. The server can flush partial messages to STDOUT as it produces data. For example, a long-running CLI tool (say it’s running a shell command) could output incremental logs via notifications. Each JSON message is written on a new line (or with length prefix) and flushed immediately; the host reads these and can display live feedback. STDIO has no built-in multiplexing, but since JSON-RPC is text-based, it’s straightforward to handle one message at a time in sequence.

Launching and management: The host can spawn such a CLI tool using standard OS process APIs. For instance, in Rust one could use std::process::Command to start the child process and connect pipes to its stdio. The host must handle if the process exits or crashes – in MCP, the client can attempt to restart the server process if needed, or propagate an error to the user. The MCP STDIO transport is ideal for local integrations and simple tools because it avoids networking complexity and has low latency (everything stays on localhost). Many reference MCP servers (like a SQLite query server or filesystem reader) are implemented as lightweight CLI programs following this pattern.

Security sandboxing: One can run the CLI tool with restricted permissions if needed (for example, dropping privileges or using a container) to protect the host. Since the host is executing an external tool, it should ensure the user trusts that tool. MCP’s design assumes the user has consented to using that server tool. With STDIO, access to local resources is direct (the tool can read files or DBs if allowed), so proper OS-level security (file permissions, etc.) must be in place. The protocol itself remains the same JSON messages, just carried over pipes.

HTTP Streaming Implementation (Rust Examples)

In networked scenarios or whenever we prefer a service architecture, MCP can run over HTTP with streaming responses. The protocol here follows a simple pattern:

  1. Client-to-Server (HTTP POST): Each JSON-RPC request or notification from the client is sent as an HTTP POST to the server’s MCP endpoint (e.g. POST /mcp). The JSON body contains the method and params just like in STDIO mode. The server parses the JSON from the HTTP request body.

  2. Server-to-Client Responses: For each request, the server can respond in two ways:

    • Single response: If the operation is quick or one-off, just return an HTTP 200 with a JSON body containing the response object (Content-Type: application/json). This covers simple requests that don’t need streaming.
    • Streaming response: If the operation produces multiple messages or needs to keep the client updated, the server returns an SSE stream (Content-Type: text/event-stream). The HTTP connection remains open, and the server sends a sequence of SSE events. Each event’s data is a JSON-RPC message (often a partial result or a notification). The stream can end with a final event that contains the actual JSON-RPC response to fulfill the request id.
  3. Server-Initiated Messages: MCP also allows the server to send messages without a specific client request prompting them (e.g. notifications or even new requests to the client). To enable this over HTTP, the client can establish a long-lived SSE subscription. For example, the client might GET /mcp/stream which the server handles by keeping open and pushing events for any asynchronous notifications. In practice, this could be used for server-to-client callbacks or broadcasts. Each event might include an "id" if it’s a response to something, or no id if it’s a pure notification. The SSE events can have incremental event-id headers so clients can reconnect and resume after a disconnect by using the Last-Event-ID header – ensuring reliable delivery of async updates.

Rust Server Example: We can implement an MCP HTTP server in Rust using frameworks like Axum or Warp. Below is a conceptual snippet with Axum (using async Rust and SSE):

use axum::{Router, routing::get, routing::post, extract::Json, response::sse::{Sse, Event}};
use futures::stream::{Stream, StreamExt};
use serde_json::Value;
use std::convert::Infallible;

// Handler for MCP POST requests
async fn handle_mcp_request(Json(payload): Json<Value>) -> Sse<impl Stream<Item = Result<Event, Infallible>>> {
    // Parse JSON-RPC request from payload
    let method = payload.get("method").and_then(Value::as_str).unwrap_or("");
    let id = payload.get("id").cloned();
    if method == "longTask" {
        // For demonstration, stream multiple updates for a longTask
        let mut counter = 0;
        // Create a stream of SSE events
        let stream = futures::stream::unfold(counter, |state| async move {
            if state < 5 {
                // Example partial notification
                let data = json!({"jsonrpc":"2.0", "method":"partial", "params": {"progress": state * 20}});
                let event = Event::default().data(data.to_string());
                Some((Ok(event), state + 1))
            } else {
                // Final result event
                let result = json!({"jsonrpc":"2.0", "id": id, "result": {"status": "done"}});
                let event = Event::default().data(result.to_string());
                None::<(Result<Event, Infallible>, i32)> // end of stream
            }
        });
        Sse::new(stream)  // return SSE response
    } else {
        // Handle simple request with immediate JSON response
        let result = json!({"jsonrpc":"2.0","id": id, "result": "ok"});
        // Convert to an SSE stream of one event for consistency
        let event = Event::default().data(result.to_string());
        Sse::new(futures::stream::once(async move { Ok(event) }))
    }
}

// Setting up Axum routes (for illustration)
let app = Router::new().route("/mcp", post(handle_mcp_request));

In this sketch, handle_mcp_request inspects the incoming JSON. If the method is "longTask", it creates an SSE stream that emits several "partial" events (with progress percentages) and then a final event with the result. If it’s some other quick method, it just responds with one event containing the result. The use of axum::response::sse::Sse type wraps a Rust Stream of events into an HTTP response that Axum will encode as text/event-stream properly. Clients (in Rust, Python, or any language) would simply POST JSON to /mcp and, if they see an SSE response (indicated by headers), read the events as they come.

Rust Client Example: On the client side, one can use an HTTP library (like reqwest in Rust) to post JSON and handle SSE. E.g., using reqwest one can do:

let client = reqwest::Client::new();
let resp = client.post("http://localhost:3000/mcp")
    .json(&request_json)
    .send()
    .await?;
if resp.headers().get(reqwest::header::CONTENT_TYPE) == Some(&"text/event-stream".parse().unwrap()) {
    let mut stream = resp.bytes_stream();
    while let Some(chunk) = stream.next().await {
        // parse chunk as SSE event (each event ends with two newlines)
        // extract JSON data from it and handle it
    }
} else {
    let result_json: Value = resp.json().await?;
    // handle single JSON response
}

This pseudo-code posts a JSON-RPC request. If the server responded with SSE, it iterates over the byte stream, splitting events and parsing JSON from each event’s data. If it was a normal JSON response, it parses it directly. There are also higher-level SSE client libraries that can abstract the parsing.

HTTP vs STDIO Parity: Both modes support the same semantics. HTTP adds overhead of HTTP headers and slightly more complexity in streaming, but it allows multiple clients and remote connections. STDIO is simpler and good for one-to-one local connections. We ensure that the message format and protocol commands are identical in both cases, so a server could even offer both interfaces (e.g., a Rust MCP server could listen on a TCP port for HTTP while also accepting STDIO for local usage). Internally, the business logic for handling method calls and producing results is the same; only the transport differs. The official MCP spec defines these as two standard transport mechanisms: Standard I/O and Streamable HTTP. Developers can choose whichever fits their deployment, or even offer both concurrently.

Security Considerations

Secure context and operations: Because MCP bridges AI models with powerful tools (filesystems, databases, code execution), security is paramount. The protocol itself is content-agnostic (it just wraps messages), so securing an MCP deployment involves encryption of the channel, authentication of parties, and careful sandboxing of what tools can do. Our design adds multiple layers of security, including quantum-safe cryptographic wrapping for scenarios that demand high security (as in the QuDAG network), as well as standard best practices for any RPC system.

Transport Encryption: In local STDIO mode, encryption is not needed on the pipe (it’s an internal process pipe). But for HTTP mode, especially if used over untrusted networks, use TLS for transport encryption. To be quantum-resistant, one could use a TLS library that supports PQ key exchange (some TLS libraries now support hybrid key exchanges with algorithms like Kyber). Alternatively, at the application layer, we can perform our own key exchange using CRYSTALS-Kyber – a lattice-based KEM algorithm. Kyber was selected by NIST as a standard for post-quantum encryption, providing a way for two parties to establish a shared secret that a quantum adversary cannot easily crack. In practice, the client and server can perform a one-time Kyber handshake at session start: the server sends its Kyber public parameters, the client uses them to encrypt a random session key, and the server decapsulates to get that session key. That symmetric session key (e.g. 256-bit) can then encrypt all subsequent JSON payloads (using fast symmetric crypto like AES or ChaCha20). This ensures that even if an eavesdropper records the traffic, a future quantum computer couldn’t retroactively decrypt it.

Authentication and Signing: To prevent tampering or impersonation, all messages can be digitally signed with CRYSTALS-Dilithium, which is a lattice-based digital signature scheme (also selected by NIST). Each MCP agent or server would have its own Dilithium key pair. Before communication begins, they exchange public keys (or better, share via a trusted directory or certificate). Every JSON-RPC message’s content (or its hash) is then signed and attached (e.g. an extra "signature" field). The receiver verifies the signature using the sender’s public key, ensuring the message truly came from the claimed identity and wasn’t altered. Dilithium signatures are quite fast and short (e.g. a few KB), so this is feasible to do on each message or at least each SSE event. This is especially important in a distributed QuDAG scenario where malicious nodes might try to inject or modify messages.

DAG-based Integrity (QuDAG): In a QuDAG architecture (a quantum-resistant DAG-based anonymous network), messages are not just passed peer-to-peer, but also recorded in a DAG data structure for consensus. Each message (vertex in the DAG) can include cryptographic links to its parents (previous messages) and a signature. Our MCP messages in such a system should incorporate a hash chain: e.g., each message could have a field referencing the hashes of one or more prior messages it depends on. By signing this, we create a tamper-evident ledger of communications. If any message was altered, its hash link in a descendant would fail verification. The QuDAG network can run a consensus algorithm (like a quantum-resistant Avalanche as mentioned in QuDAG) to agree on the order of messages or to ensure consistency. The MCP layer would be agnostic to consensus mechanics, but from a design perspective we ensure compatibility: include message IDs/hashes, allow multiple parent references (hence a DAG, not just chain), and have every node sign its outgoing messages. This way, an agent’s actions are verifiable and traceable (to authorized observers) without revealing content to unauthorized ones.

Anonymous Routing and Access Control: QuDAG is described as an anonymous comms layer, so it likely employs mix-network or onion routing. This is below MCP’s concern, but one must consider that if MCP is running over such a network, the protocol should minimize any identifying metadata in messages. For example, rather than sending explicit user identifiers, an agent might use opaque session tokens. The encryption and signatures can be done in a way that doesn’t reveal identity to intermediaries (signatures can be verified by the endpoint after decrypting the payload, so intermediaries only see ciphertext). We should also incorporate capability-based security: servers announce what they can do, and hosts only allow certain methods. The MCP handshake negotiates capabilities, and the host should reject any unexpected method call from a server for safety. Each tool server ideally runs with least privilege – e.g., a database MCP server should only have access to that database, not the entire filesystem.

In summary, our MCP design secures the channel with encryption (optionally PQC for future-proofing) and the content with signatures. It embraces the key principles of user consent and isolation described in the MCP spec. By layering classical security (TLS, auth tokens) with quantum-safe crypto (Kyber, Dilithium), and by leveraging the DAG structure for integrity, we ensure that the communication remains confidential, authentic, and resistant to even advanced attackers. These measures protect not just against eavesdropping, but also against message forgery or replay. (For instance, using message IDs and nonces can help detect replays, and the DAG’s consensus can prevent an attacker from reordering messages undetected.)

Extensibility and Future Integration

Our MCP design is built to last – it can evolve and integrate with future agentic runtimes or swarm schedulers without needing a complete redesign. This is achieved through modularity and versioned capability negotiation:

  • Feature Negotiation: MCP uses a capability-based handshake where clients and servers declare their supported features at initialization. This means if a future extension is added (say a new message type for a scheduling command or a new cryptographic method), an agent can advertise support and the other side will only use it if both agree. The core protocol stays minimal and compatible, while new abilities stack on top. The design explicitly allows adding features progressively and negotiating them as needed. For example, if in the future an “agent scheduling” feature is introduced, servers that support it would list it in their capabilities, and clients could then send new methods like scheduleTask or spawnAgent safely.

  • Swarm and Multi-Agent Coordination: In a Claude-Flow “swarm mode” (where hundreds of agent instances run concurrently), the protocol can serve as the common language for coordination. Each agent might be an MCP server exposing certain tools or data; a central orchestrator (MCP client/host) can route tasks to them. Because MCP clients manage 1:1 connections to servers, a swarm controller can spin up a new MCP client instance for each agent it launches, maintaining isolation between agents. The swarm scheduler could use an agent registry that tracks which agent/server has which capabilities, then direct JSON-RPC requests to the appropriate one. The uniform message format makes it easy to add such a layer – the scheduler might just generate higher-level plans (a DAG of tasks) and then translate each task into an MCP method call to the right agent. The state synchronization features (progress updates, etc.) help the scheduler monitor all agents’ status in real time, adjusting as needed (e.g., if one agent finishes a task early, the scheduler gets a notification and can reallocate resources).

  • Agentic Runtime Integration: In the context of an agentic runtime (where an AI can spawn sub-agents or tools dynamically), MCP can act as the bridging protocol. For example, an LLM agent could decide it needs a new tool – the runtime could launch a new MCP server (perhaps by using a template or image) and connect it on the fly. Because our protocol is standardized, the agent doesn’t need to know details of the tool’s API beyond the MCP interface. This fosters a swarm of services approach: many small specialized MCP servers can be orchestrated together. The runtime or scheduler can also inject metadata like task IDs, deadlines, or priorities into MCP messages (e.g., as part of params or a custom header) to help with scheduling policies. Since JSON is flexible, adding a "priority": "high" or "group": "experiment-123" field to all requests is straightforward, and agents that don’t recognize it can ignore it (forward compatibility).

  • Extensible Message Schema: The protocol can be extended to support additional message types or metadata without breaking existing clients. For instance, if we wanted to integrate a logging/tracing layer for debugging swarms, we could define a special notification method like "log" that agents can emit with debug info. Older components that don’t understand it will simply not act on it (since it’s a notification), while new monitoring tools could listen for those. Similarly, if quantum-safe crypto gets superseded or if we want to integrate future cryptographic proofs (like zero-knowledge proofs that an agent did some computation correctly), we can append those to messages as optional fields. The design principles of MCP emphasize clear separation and composability – each part of the system focuses on its role, and new parts can be added without reworking the whole.

  • Backward and Forward Compatibility: By versioning the protocol and using feature flags, we ensure older agents can still connect to newer hosts (they’ll simply not use new features) and vice versa. The MCP spec is versioned (e.g. “2025-06-18” as of writing), and our design would follow semantic versioning for changes. A swarm scheduling layer might be introduced in MCP 2.0, for example, but an MCP 1.x server could still function with an MCP 2.0 client if it sticks to the core methods it knows. This is analogous to how web browsers handle new HTTP headers – unknown ones are ignored. We strive for graceful degradation: all critical interactions (requests for data, tool invocations) use well-defined base protocol methods, while more advanced coordination (like migrating a session to another agent, or load-balancing between agents) can be done through optional extensions.

In conclusion, the dual-mode MCP we designed is not only robust for current use cases but also future-proof. It can operate in local CLI environments or scale up to cloud-based microservices with equal ease. It supports rich streaming and async behavior required by complex multi-agent reasoning, and it embeds cutting-edge security to guard these powerful capabilities. By adhering to open standards and emphasizing extensibility, this MCP will be able to integrate with emerging agent frameworks, whether it’s Anthropic’s Claude running dozens of codelets, or a decentralized QuDAG network of AI services. In short, we’ve built the foundation for structured, context-rich agent communication that’s ready for the next generation of AI-driven applications – from single-user desktop tools to swarming agents orchestrating tasks in parallel, all speaking the same Model Context Protocol.

Sources: The design draws on the official MCP specification and docs, which describe JSON-RPC messaging, STDIO and HTTP transports, and the client-server architecture. It also incorporates insights from recent implementations (Claude-Flow and QuDAG) to ensure support for swarm orchestration and quantum-resistant security. By combining these state-of-the-art practices, the proposed MCP design achieves a comprehensive solution for context-aware, streamable, and secure agent communication.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment