sbp · July 27, 2011 12:49 · Jul 25, 2011
diff --git a/colloquial-summaries.txt b/colloquial-summaries.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+Submission:
+
+The Colloquial Web group evaluates existing practices amongst core web
+technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It aims to provide users and
+vendors with clear guidelines for deployment and innovation for web
+applications. Example problem domains include continued use of deprecated
+constructs, the rise in external services for hosting solutions such as Google
+Web Fonts or MathJax, and comparing attitudes to RDFa and microdata.
+
+The group will not produce languages, but may for example create profiles of
+weighted technique matrices. In other words, more broadly speaking the group
+has a bias towards empirical and descriptivist methods, but is not constrained
+to these approaches.
+
+Revision:
+
+The Colloquial Web group evaluates existing practices amongst core web
+technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It aims to give users and
+vendors clear reports on deployment and innovation for web applications.
+Example problem domains include continued use of deprecated constructs, the
+rise in external services for hosting solutions such as Google Web Fonts or
+MathJax, and comparing attitudes to RDFa and Microdata.
+
+The group researches the relationship between emerging social practices as
+regards existing technologies and their standards. A central research goal is
+to study and contribute to changing perceptions of conformance. Though broadly
+speaking the group has a bias towards empirical and descriptivist methods, it
+is not constrained to these approaches. It will not for example produce
+languages, but may create profiles of weighted technique matrices.