-
-
Save thekindofme/26718f4a29bc26a49a721af434436c2a to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
JIRA Issue Template
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
{ | |
"options": { | |
"domains": [], | |
"inputIDs": [], | |
"limit": [] | |
}, | |
"templates": [{ | |
"issuetype-field": "", | |
"name": "DEFAULT TEMPLATE", | |
"projects-field": "", | |
"text": "*Checklist*\n<TI>Before creating the issue, make sure these are checked:</TI>\n<TI>- Can this be split into smaller issues?</TI>\n<TI>- Is Issue Type correct? (Story - Product/Feature, Task - Engineering/Implementation)</TI>\n<TI>- Is Priority correct?\n<TI>- Is Component specified?\n<TI>- Is Fix Version specified?</TI>\n<TI>- Is Linked Issue specified, if any?</TI>\n<TI>- Is Label specified, if any?</TI>\n<TI>- Is Epic specified, if any?</TI>\n\n*Summary*\nAs a <TI>type of user</TI>, I want <TI>to perform some task</TI>, so that I can <TI>achieve some goal</TI>.\n\n*Context*\n<TI>Provide background details, clarifications, or notes for implementation.</TI>\n<TI>- Is this a breaking change? If so, create JIRA issue here: https://goo.gl/Ug44U1</TI>\n<TI>- Should this be behind Arturo?</TI>\n<TI>- Does this require a mini kick-off?</TI>\n\n*Additional Information*\n<TI>Provide relevant references here.</TI>\n<TI>Zendesk Ticket: URL</TI>\n<TI>Slack conversation: URL</TI>\n\n*Dependencies*\n<TI>Does this require support from any internal/external teams?</TI>\n\n*Risks*\n<TI>Identify risks could be introduced by this.</TI>\n\n*QA Notes*\n<TI>Provide instructions on how to QA/Dev-QA this.</TI>\n\n*Acceptance Criteria*\n<TI>Enter the definition of done here.</TI>\n<TI>- Does this require unit tests?</TI>\n<TI>- Does this require browser tests?</TI>\n<TI>- Does this require documentation update?</TI>\n<TI>- Does this require i18n update?</TI>\n<TI>- Have this been QA/Dev-QA approved?</TI>" | |
}, | |
{ | |
"issuetype-field": "Bug", | |
"name": "BUG TEMPLATE", | |
"projects-field": "", | |
"text": "*Summary*\n<TI>Enter summary of the problem here.</TI>\n\n*Steps to Reproduce*\n<TI>Enter detailed steps to reproduce here. More detail is better.</TI>\n\n*Expected Behaviour*\n<TI>Enter what should happen here.</TI>\n\n*Additional Details*\n<TI>Enter any other details such as examples, links to requirements, etc. Any criteria that might help with fixing the problem. Attach screenshots if possible. More detail is better.</TI>\n\n*Workaround*\n<TI>If there is a way to work around the problem, place that information here.</TI>" | |
}, | |
{ | |
"issuetype-field": "Story", | |
"name": "STORY TEMPLATE", | |
"projects-field": "", | |
"text": "*Story*\nAs a <TI>type of user/persona</TI>, I want <TI>to perform some task</TI>, so that I can <TI>achieve some goal/benefit/value</TI>.\n\n*Details*\n<TI>Enter any details, clarifications, answers to questions, or points about implementation here.</TI>\n\n*Additional Information*\n<TI>Enter any background or references such as Stack Overflow, MSDN, blogs, etc. that may help with developing the feature.</TI>\n\n*Acceptance Criteria*\n<TI>Enter the conditions of satisfaction here. That is, the conditions that will satisfy the user/persona that the goal/benefit/value has been achieved. Do we need automated tests for this? </TI>\n\n*Testing details*\n<TI>Do we have all information to test this card? Talk about edge cases. Automated test coverage</TI>" | |
}, | |
{ | |
"issuetype-field": "Task", | |
"name": "TASK TEMPLATE", | |
"projects-field": "", | |
"text": "" | |
}, | |
{ | |
"issuetype-field": "Sub-task", | |
"name": "SUB TASK TEMPLATE", | |
"projects-field": "", | |
"text": "" | |
}, | |
{ | |
"issuetype-field": "New Feature", | |
"name": "NEW FEATURE TEMPLATE", | |
"projects-field": "", | |
"text": "*Summary*\n<TI>Enter a summary of the New Feature here.</TI>\n\n*Details*\n<TI>Enter any details, clarifications, answers to questions, or points about implementation here.</TI>\n\n*Additional Information*\n<TI>Enter any background or references such as Stack Overflow, MSDN, blogs, etc. that may help with developing the feature.</TI>" | |
}, | |
{ | |
"issuetype-field": "Improvement", | |
"name": "IMPROVEMENT TEMPLATE", | |
"projects-field": "", | |
"text": "*Summary*\n<TI>Enter a summary of the Improvement here.</TI>\n\n*Details*\n<TI>Enter any details, clarifications, answers to questions, or points about implementation here.</TI>\n\n*Additional Information*\n<TI>Enter any background or references such as Stack Overflow, MSDN, blogs, etc. that may help with developing the feature.</TI>" | |
}, | |
{ | |
"issuetype-field": "Epic", | |
"name": "EPIC TEMPLATE", | |
"projects-field": "", | |
"text": "*Epic*\nAs a <TI>type of user/persona</TI>, I want <TI>to perform some task</TI>, so that I can <TI>achieve some goal/benefit/value</TI>.\n\n*Details*\n<TI>Enter any details, clarifications, answers to questions, and points about implementation here.</TI>" | |
} | |
] | |
} |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment