Skip to content

Instantly share code, notes, and snippets.

View thomasdavis's full-sized avatar

Thomas Davis thomasdavis

View GitHub Profile
{
"basics": {
"name": "Thomasaasd asda",
"label": "Invenasdtbosar andasd Businessman",
"picture": "https://example.com/photo.jpg",
"email": "[email protected]",
"phone": "(123) 456-7890",
"website": "https://thomassdedison.com",
"summary": "asdasdsasdsdsProlific inventor and businessasdasdman known for developing many deviasdasdsces that greatly infasasluenced life around the world, including the phonograph, the motion picture camera, and the electric light bulb.",
"location": {

Thanks! I’ll explore potential bottlenecks and failure modes of your current AI summary tooltip design when handling large AG Grid datasets (10,000 to 1 million+ rows), and then provide a range of strategies to make it scale effectively without sacrificing UX or LLM performance. I’ll also consider architectural and LLM prompt/streaming optimizations tailored for your Vercel + OpenAI setup.

I’ll report back shortly with practical options.

Scaling LLM-Based Summaries for Large Datasets

Introduction: Implementing an AI summary tooltip in a data grid provides users with quick insights, but scaling this to massive datasets (tens of thousands to millions of rows) introduces significant challenges. The current approach – sending all active column values to an OpenAI model via the Vercel AI SDK – works for small tables, but breaks down as data grows. We need to analyze where this design fails at scale, and explore both frontend and backend strategies to make the summary feature robust for any dataset si

@thomasdavis
thomasdavis / deepresearch_clone_engine.md
Last active May 7, 2025 23:44
deepresearch_clone_engine.md

Thanks! I’ll design a full, modular pipeline that builds a Deep Research system like OpenAI’s but customized to your analyzer stack. It will:

  • Use your analyzer output to deeply understand the user's query and tone
  • Decompose complex or multi-part prompts into subquestions using QDMR-style logic
  • Auto-generate research plans with prioritized search queries, tailored to the topic
  • Use Firecrawl/Perplexity APIs to retrieve high-signal results, emphasizing academic sources
  • Loop over search + synthesis, revising the plan if the evidence doesn’t satisfy the question
  • Generate sectioned Markdown reports with structured citations, tables, graphs where needed
  • Embed inline source links with strategies to future-proof them (e.g., reverse RAG or citation mirrors)

Great, I’ll look into academic and practical frameworks for formally breaking down user questions and intent, drawing from linguistics, epistemology, ontology, and NLP. This will include theories of meaning, discourse analysis, question decomposition, and related computational approaches.

I’ll let you know as soon as I have a structured summary of the best-supported methodologies and tools.

Formal Frameworks for Analyzing User Intent in Natural Language

Introduction

Understanding a user's intent from a natural language query often requires decomposing the utterance into formal components of meaning. Consider the example: "Tell me if the US elections affected the Canadian ones?" – This question contains an imperative request ("Tell me...") and an embedded yes/no query about causality between two events. To analyze such an utterance, one must identify the speech act (a request for information), the semantic content (whether U.S. elections had an effect on Canadian elections), and the impli

Below is a practical recipe + Node .js scaffolding for turning your 250-page Markdown dump into three linguistics-aware assets:

  1. CLDF StructureTable – grammar-feature spreadsheet
  2. XIGT (JSON) – interlinear examples
  3. OntoLex-Lemon (JSON-LD) – lexicon entries

The same pattern works for any other schema; just swap the “output-format” system message.


Below is a “from-PDF-to-production” blueprint that lets you pour the entire Grammar of Kuku Yalanji into a single modern stack – relational tables for precision, a vector index for AI search, and a graph/RDF layer for linked-data reuse.


1 Why three layers?

Layer What it gives you Typical tech
Relational / JSON B Loss-less storage of paradigms, rules, example IDs; fast SQL & GraphQL PostgreSQL 16
Vector index Semantic retrieval for RAG (“find the paragraph that explains ergative case”) pgvector inside Postgres OR an external DB like Weaviate citeturn0search2turn0search3

A grammar of the Kuku Yalanji language of north Queensland

Also in Pacific Linguistics

  • Mark Harvey, 2001, A grammar of Limilngan: a language of the Mary River region, Northern Territory.
  • Jane Simpson, David Nash, Mary Laughren, Peter Austin and Barry Alpher, 2001, Forty years on: Ken Hale and Australian languages.

David Rose, 2001, The Western Desert code: an Australian cryptogrammar.

L.A. Hercus, 1999, A grammar of the Wirangu language from the West Coast of South Australia.

---
config:
layout: fixed
---
flowchart TD
n1["Message Received"] --> n2["Intent Prompt"]
n2 --> n3["No Tool"] & n5["Found Tool"]
n3 --> n6["Stream MainPrompt"]
n5 --> n7["GetToolStrategy"]
n7 --> n8["NoToolStrategy"] & n10["FoundToolStrategy"]

Perfect — I’ll begin crafting a complete design system for PrecisionCore tailored for web applications that work well on both desktop and mobile. It’ll default to light mode, include dark mode support, and cover all essential components found in modern web apps.

The system will include:

  • In-depth design philosophy and visual principles
  • Guidelines for layout, spacing, grids, and UI behaviors
  • Component breakdowns with usage rules
  • Code examples in vanilla HTML/CSS (primary) and TailwindCSS (secondary)
  • Mockups and image examples of components in the PrecisionCore style

I’ll let you know as soon as it’s ready for review.

Got it. I’ll put together a comprehensive report on how BLAH can build a powerful, compute-enabled registry for tools—including support for remote CPU/GPU execution, bandwidth middle-manning, and strategic partnerships with providers. I’ll focus on how to bootstrap with CPU-based sponsored compute, evaluate which providers make the most sense based on cost, ecosystem alignment, and open-source stance, and outline how to grow the registry into an "npm for AI tools" empire.

I’ll let you know when the report is ready for review.

Compute-Enabled Registry for Remote AI Tool Execution (BLAH)

Prototype and POC Requirements

Remote CPU Execution (1-minute tasks): The initial BLAH prototype should support running tools on remote CPU-based infrastructure with short execution times (up to ~1 minute per run). This allows demonstrating end-to-end functionality without needing specialized hardware. For example, Val.town’s free tier supports 1 minute wall-clock time per execution ([Val Town](https://www.val.