LLM-as-a-Judge papers from arXiv digest emails (no-reply@arxiv.org)
Emails scanned: 100 (newest 100 of ~200 arXiv digests, 2026-05-26 to 2026-10-16, America/Toronto dates) | Papers kept: 275 (unique arXiv IDs; 211 with abstracts, 64 appear only in "replaced with revised version" notices that contain no abstract).
Selection: papers whose title/abstract is about LLM/VLM judges, evaluators, graders, rubric/pairwise/preference evaluation, judge-based rewards/reward models, judge bias/reliability, meta-evaluation. Abstract text is verbatim from the email. "Email date" = date of the digest email (America/Toronto); "also in" lists other digests that listed the same ID.