It turns out LLM's can generate the STOP DOING MATH meme https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/stop-doing-math

STOP_DOING_MATH.md

STOP DOING MATH

• NUMBERS WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE GIVEN NAMES
• YEARS OF COUNTING yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for going higher than your FINGERS
• Wanted to go higher anyway for a laugh? We had a tool for that: It was called "GUESSING"
• "Yes please give me ZERO of something. Please give me INFINITE of it" - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged

LOOK at what Mathematicians have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the calculators & abacus we built for them

(This is REAL Math, done by REAL Mathematicians):

[fig1 of a complex surface ???] [fig2 of a more complex surface ????] [fig3 of a hyper shape ?????????]

"Hello I would like [graph] apples please"

They have played us for absolute fools

STOP_DOING_THEORY.md

STOP DOING THEORY

• Thought about ATOMS for MILLENNIA but couldn't even find an ELECTRON
• AI? More like "Aye, I didn't see the SCALING HYPOTHESIS coming!"
• Wanted FLIGHT? Theorists be like: "Maybe we just flap real hard?"
• "I've mathed out the perfect STEAM ENGINE!" - Said no one ever before actually building it.

LOOK at the grand THEORIES they've been touting:

• TIMELESS DECISION THEORY
• SEMANTIC GRAPH
• PROVABLY SAFE AGI

(This is REAL Thoery, done by REAL Theorizers):

"According to my calculations, this metaphor for a bird should definitely fly." Reality: "Hold my beer."

They have played us for absolute fools

STOP_THOERIZING_WITHOUT_TESTIING.md

STOP THEORIZING WITHOUT TESTING

• YEARS OF RESEARCH and yet MOST BREAKTHROUGHS come from ACCIDENTAL EXPERIMENTS
• "Let's try it out on paper first" - Said every researcher before their theory got debunked by a simple test
• "My model predicts X" but REALITY shows Y. Yet, they WON'T BUDGE.

LOOK at the grand THEORIES they've been touting:

• TIMELESS DECISION THEORY
• Distinction Graphs and Graphtropy
• AIXI

(This is REAL Thoery, done by REAL Theorizers):

"Hello, based on my calculations, this should work" Yet it spectacularly fails in practice

They have played us for absolute fools

STOP DOING RECURSION

• FUNCTIONS WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO CALL THEMSELVES

• YEARS OF NESTING yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for going deeper than THREE STACK FRAMES

• Wanted to go deeper anyway for a laugh? We had a tool for that: It was called "ITERATION"

• "Yes please give me BASE CASE of something. Please give me INFINITE STACK OVERFLOW of it" - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged

LOOK at what Computer Scientists have been demanding your Respect for all this time, with all the compilers & IDEs we built for them (This is REAL Recursion, done by REAL Programmers):

[INCOMPREHENSIBLE FIBONACCI TREE]

?????

[INSCRUTABLE MERGE SORT]

???????

[MIND-MELTING TOWERS OF HANOI]

???????????????

"Hello I would like n + factorial(n-1) apples please"

They have played us for absolute fools​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​