Created
May 12, 2026 09:50
-
-
Save willcl-ark/674740cbf36077c9a5a8bfca77e4d70d to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| ref: https://my.cdash.org/builds/3535291/build | |
| • Cause: this is Darwin ranlib, not a capnp build problem. | |
| ranlib is indexing static archives and warns when an archive member has no externally visible symbols: | |
| ranlib: file: lib/libbitcoin_ipc.a(common.capnp.proxy-types.c++.o) has no symbols | |
| Several of the warned objects are expected to be empty or symbol-free in this configuration: | |
| - src/test/util/time.cpp only includes test/util/time.h | |
| - src/deploymentstatus.cpp has only static_assert/compile-time checks | |
| - src/sync.cpp emits nothing unless DEBUG_LOCKORDER or DEBUG_LOCKCONTENTION is enabled | |
| - src/ipc/capnp/mining.cpp has an empty namespace mp {} after includes | |
| - the generated common.capnp.proxy-* files can similarly be symbol-free depending on schema contents/templates | |
| So no, I would not disable capnp on this platform just because of these warnings. Capnp is only part of the noise; the same warning appears for | |
| non-capnp objects too. | |
| The real issue is that CDash/CTest is classifying harmless Darwin archive-tool output as build warnings. Reasonable fixes are: | |
| 1. Add a CDash/CTest warning exception for this exact ranlib diagnostic. | |
| 2. Use a ranlib/archiver setup that does not print this diagnostic, if available in the Nix Darwin toolchain. | |
| 3. Longer term, avoid compiling intentionally empty/symbol-free .cpp files into static libraries, but that is a source/build-system cleanup and | |
| not specific to your nightly platform. | |
| For the nightly dashboard, I’d suppress the warning pattern rather than disable IPC/capnp. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment