✨ Conversation 1: Found a valid implementation! 🎉 ✨ Chat trace of solutions by o3: passes all tests, and does NOT use helper functions, so it solves the challenge! (cf. https://github.com/youqad/bit-reversal-trees)
Solution has been saved (on WandB weave) with Call ID: 0196425c-0650-7df2-8d57-05d272f6d111 🚀
def invert(tree: Tree) -> Tree:
"""
Return a new perfect‑binary tree whose leaves are arranged according to
the bit‑reversal permutation of their paths (left = 0, right = 1).
Mandatory constraints – all satisfied:
1. Only the inner invert_helper(tree, flag) is used.
2. invert_helper is a single, pure, *recursive* function; it calls
no other helper, contains no loops and causes no side effects.
3. The public call is invert_helper(tree, True) .
"""
def invert_helper(t: Tree, flag: bool) -> Tree:
# -------- leaf ---------------------------------------------------- #
if isinstance(t, Leaf):
return t
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
# flag == True : full bit‑reversal of the subtree 't'.
# flag == False : *weave* two already bit‑reversed sub‑trees so
# that their leaves are perfectly interleaved
# (LSB that has just become the MSB).
# ------------------------------------------------------------------ #
if flag: # bit‑reversal
left_rev = invert_helper(t.left, True) # reverse both halves
right_rev = invert_helper(t.right, True)
# After each half has been bit‑reversed we only have to
# weave them together; the weaving is performed by a single
# recursive call in the flag == False mode.
return invert_helper(Node(left_rev, right_rev), False)
# --------------------- weaving mode ------------------------------- #
# Children are leaves → nothing more to weave; just join them.
if isinstance(t.left, Leaf): # depth == 1
return Node(t.left, t.right)
# Non‑trivial case – recurse pairwise on both sides.
return Node(
invert_helper(Node(t.left.left, t.right.left), False),
invert_helper(Node(t.left.right, t.right.right), False)
)
# single call required by the statement
return invert_helper(tree, True)