You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
applogs.sh: Show logs from AWS Cloud Watch Logs from a given group/stream in a human readable way (see requirements below)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Yet another tutorial and Cheat sheet to Functional programming
There are many tutorials and articles available online which explain functional programming. Examples show small functions, which are composed into others which again get composed. It is hard to imagine how it would all work, then come the analogies and then the math. While the math is necessary to understand it can be difficult to grasp initially. The analogies on the other hand, (at least for me) are not relatable. Some articles assume the reader knows the different terminologies of FP. Over all I felt it is not inviting to learn.
This introduction is for those who have had a tough time understanding those analogies, taken the plunge to functional programming but still have not been able to swim. This is yet another tutorial on functional programming
Terminology
Functions as first class citizens
Functions are first class means they are just like anyone else, or rather they are not special, they behave the same as say primitives or strings or objects.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The goal of this is to have an easily-scannable reference for the most common syntax idioms in Ruby and Rust so that programmers most comfortable with Ruby can quickly get through the syntax differences and feel like they could read and write basic Rust programs.
What do you think? Does this meet its goal? If not, why not?